Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293493›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2020

Potential mechanisms for lumbar spinal stiffness change following spinal manipulative therapy: a scoping review.

Peter Jun, Isabelle Pagé, Albert Vette, Greg Kawchuk

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04794647 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Manual Therapy Applied to the Cervical Region on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspesific Neck Pain: A Randomised Placebo Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled66ConditionsNeck PainArmsCervical mobilization, Placebo mobilization
NCT06399497 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Lumbar Spinal Manipulation on Muscle Mechanical Properties, Pressure Pain Threshold and Mechanical Perception Threshold in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de CórdobaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled34ConditionsLow Back PainArmsspinal manipulation, simulated manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter JunFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Corbett Hall, 8205 114 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2090-1036
Isabelle PagéFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Corbett Hall, 8205 114 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7175-0402
Albert VetteDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211-116 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1H9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2543-568X
Greg KawchukDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Corbett Hall, 8205 114 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G4, Canada. greg.kawchuk@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9487-1779
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn individuals having low back pain, the application of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been shown to reduce spinal stiffness in those who report improvements in post-SMT disability. The underlying mechanism for this rapid change in stiffness is not understood presently. As clinicians and patients may benefit from a better understanding of this mechanism in terms of optimizing care delivery, the objective of this scoping review of current literature was to identify if potential mechanisms that explain this clinical response have been previously described or could be elucidated from existing data.

methodsThree literature databases were systematically searched (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PubMed). Our search terms included subject headings and keywords relevant to SMT, spinal stiffness, lumbar spine, and mechanism. Inclusion criteria for candidate studies were publication in English, quantification of lumbar spinal stiffness before and after SMT, and publication between January 2000 and June 2019.

resultsThe search identified 1931 articles. Of these studies, 10 were included following the application of the inclusion criteria. From these articles, 7 themes were identified with respect to potential mechanisms described or derived from data: 1) change in muscle activity; 2) increase in mobility; 3) decrease in pain; 4) increase in pressure pain threshold; 5) change in spinal tissue behavior; 6) change in the central nervous system or reflex pathways; and 7) correction of a vertebral dysfunction.

conclusionsThis scoping review identified 7 themes put forward by authors to explain changes in spinal stiffness following SMT. Unfortunately, none of the studies provided data which would support the promotion of one theme over another. As a result, this review suggests a need to develop a theoretical framework to explain rapid biomechanical changes following SMT to guide and prioritize future investigations in this important clinical area.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaHumansLow Back PainManipulation, SpinalRange of Motion, ArticularLow back painLumbar spineManual therapySpinal manipulationSpinal mobilizationSpinal stiffness

Identifiers

PMID32293493
PMCPMC7087370
OpenAlexW3013588764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.