Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293434›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Effects of a rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in Shanghai, China.

Fengshui Chang, Qi Zhang, Haixia Xie, Yuhui Yang, Mei Sun, Airong Wu, Jinghua Wu, Gang Chen, Feng Shen, Chengyue Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fengshui ChangChina Research Center on Disability, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qi ZhangSchool of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Haixia XieShanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai, China.
Yuhui YangChina Research Center on Disability, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mei SunChina Research Center on Disability, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Airong WuShanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai, China.
Jinghua WuShanghai Disabled Persons' Federation, Shanghai, China.
Gang ChenChina Research Center on Disability, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Feng ShenShanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai, China.
Chengyue LiChina Research Center on Disability, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jun LuChina Research Center on Disability, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. junlu_shmu@163.com.
Fudan University · CNShanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center · CNJinan Disabled Persons Federation · CNOld Dominion University · US

Funding

a major project of the National Social Science Fund of China No. 17ZDA078National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 71673052Project of key disciplines construction from the Shanghai Disabled Persons' Federation No. 2015-139Shanghai Pujiang Program of the Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau No. 17PJC003The 111 Project No. B16031the China Scholarship Council No. 201506105030the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period No. 2014BAI08B01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecialized Institution-Based Rehabilitation (SIBR) is the cornerstone of care and treatment for individuals with spinal cord injury, but most people with chronic spinal cord injury (CSCI) living in China have no SIBR experience after acute care hospital discharge. In 2009, an SIBR facility was set up in Shanghai (China) to fill this important gap in care. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated rehabilitation training program among individuals with CSCI living in Shanghai.

methodsA within-subject pre-posttest design was used to evaluate the SIBR. The sample included 455 individuals ≥1 year post-SCI, who were older than 18 years of age and were enrolled in a rehabilitation center in Shanghai, China, between 2013 and 2019. The data included individuals' sociodemographic and injury characteristics, and twenty-three indicators were used as outcome measurements to evaluate basic life skills and their applications in family and social life. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to determine which factors might have influenced the effectiveness of the SIBR.

resultsAll basic life skills and their applications in family and social life were improved, but with variations across socio-demographics. Female individuals with CSCI had better outcomes in basic life skills than did males. In terms of basic life skills and their applications in family and social life, individuals with a low level (thoracic or lumbosacral) of injury achieved more significant functional gains than those with a higher level (cervical). The baseline score was also a relevant factor in functional outcome.

conclusionsEven for individuals with a long SCI history, SIBR training can improve basic life skills and the applications of those skills in family and social life settings.

Indexed as

AdultChinaChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationRehabilitation CentersSpinal Cord InjuriesChinaChronic spinal cord injuryRehabilitationRehabilitation centersRehabilitation effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID32293434
PMCPMC7158161
OpenAlexW3015989753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.