Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293431›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

The nature and activity of liaison mental services in acute hospital settings: a multi-site cross sectional study.

Sonia Saraiva, Elspeth Guthrie, Andrew Walker, Peter Trigwell, Robert West, Farag Shuweidi, Mike Crawford, Matt Fossey, Jenny Hewison, Carolyn Czoski Murray and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sonia SaraivaLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Elspeth GuthrieLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. e.a.guthrie@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-6616
Andrew WalkerClinical Research Network National Coordinating Centre, National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Network, Leeds, UK.
Peter TrigwellNational Inpatient Centre for Psychological Medicine, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Robert WestLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-3654
Farag ShuweidiLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Mike CrawfordCollege Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-5772
Matt FosseyVeterans and Families Institute for Military Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
Jenny HewisonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-3250
Carolyn Czoski MurrayLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-2883
Claire HulmeCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-0419
Allan HouseLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8721-8026

Funding

Department of Health 13/58/08Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 13/58/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo describe the clinical activity patterns and nature of interventions of hospital-based liaison psychiatry services in England.

methodsMulti-site, cross-sectional survey. 18 acute hospitals across England with a liaison psychiatry service. All liaison staff members, at each hospital site, recorded data on each patient they had face to face contact with, over a 7 day period. Data included location of referral, source of referral, main clinical problem, type of liaison intervention employed, staff professional group and grade, referral onto other services, and standard assessment measures.

resultsA total of 1475 face to face contacts from 18 hospitals were included in the analysis, of which approximately half were follow-up reviews. There was considerable variation across sites, related to the volume of Emergency Department (ED) attendances, number of hospital admissions, and work hours of the team but not to the size of the hospital (number of beds). The most common clinical problems were co-morbid physical and psychiatric symptoms, self-harm and cognitive impairment. The main types of intervention delivered were diagnosis/formulation, risk management and advice. There were differences in the type of clinical problems seen by the services between EDs and wards, and also differences between the work conducted by doctors and nurses. Almost half of the contacts were for continuing care, rather than assessment. Eight per cent of all referrals were offered follow up with the LP team, and approximately 37% were referred to community or other services.

conclusionsThe activity of LP services is related to the flow of patients through an acute hospital. In addition to initial assessments, services provide a wide range of differing interventions, with nurses and doctors carrying out distinctly different roles within the team. The results show the volume and diversity of LP work. While much clinical contact is acute and confined to the inpatient episode, the LP service is not defined solely by an assessment and discharge function; cases are often complex and nearly half were referred for follow up including liaison team follow up.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandHealth Care SurveysHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPsychiatric Department, HospitalReferral and ConsultationActivity surveyLiaison psychiatryMental health liaison services

Identifiers

PMID32293431
PMCPMC7157982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.