Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293424›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the National Health Service diabetes prevention programme in England: qualitative study with service users, intervention providers and deliverers, commissioners and referrers.

Angela M Rodrigues, Anna Haste, Linda Penn, Ruth Bell, Carolyn Summerbell, Martin White, Ashley J Adamson, Falko F Sniehotta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M RodriguesDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK. angela.rodrigues@northumbria.ac.uk.
Anna HasteFuse: UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Linda PennPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Ruth BellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Carolyn SummerbellFuse: UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Martin WhitePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Ashley J AdamsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Falko F SniehottaPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUnited Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration · GBDurham University · GBNorthumbria University · GBTeesside University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/7Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1School for Public Health Research IS-SPH-0211-10016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Health Service diabetes prevention programme in England, (NHS DPP) aims to identify people at high risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and offer them a face-to-face, group-based, behaviour change intervention for at least 9 months. The NHS DPP was rolled out in phases. We aimed to elicit stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of the factors influencing implementation of, and participation in, the programme during the development phase.

methodsIndividual, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 50 purposively sampled stakeholders: service users (n = 20); programme commissioners (n = 7); referrers (n = 8); and intervention deliverers (n = 15). Topic guides were structured using a pragmatic, theory-informed approach. Analysis employed the framework method.

resultsWe identified factors that influenced participation: Risk communication at referral - stakeholders identified point of referral as a window of opportunity to offer brief advice, to provide an understanding of T2D risk and information about the programme; Perceived impact of the NHS DPP - service users highlighted the positive perceived impact on their behaviour change, the peer support provided by participating in the programme, the option to involve a relative, and the 'knock on' effect on others. Service users also voiced disappointment when blood test results still identified them at high risk after the programme; and Behavioural maintenance - participants highlighted the challenges linked to behavioural maintenance (e.g. discontinuation of active support). Factors influencing implementations were also identified: Case finding - stakeholders suggested that using community involvement to identify service users could increase reach and ensure that the workload was not solely on GP practices; Adaptability: intervention deliverers acknowledged the need to tailor advice to service users' preferences and needs; Accountability - the need to acknowledge who was responsible for what at different stages of the NHS DPP pathway; and Fidelity - stakeholders described procedures involved in monitoring service users' satisfaction, outcome data collection and quality assurance assessments.

conclusionsThe NHS DPP offers an evidence-informed behavioural intervention for T2D prevention. Better risk communication specification could ensure consistency at the referral stage and improve participation in the NHS DPP intervention. Cultural adaptations and outreach strategies could ensure the NHS DPP contributes to reducing health inequalities.

Indexed as

Stakeholder ParticipationAdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationState MedicineYoung AdultHealth policyNational diabetes prevention programmePublic healthType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32293424
PMCPMC7158071
OpenAlexW3015716648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.