ArticleBMC medical education2020
Patient perspectives of bedside teaching in an obstetrics, Gynaecology and neonatology hospital.
Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient perspectives on practice guidance in nursing education: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- The patients' perspective of bedside teaching in the post-Covid era.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Article
- Exploring the concepts of consumer feedback systems for occupational therapy student learning during practice placements: A scoping review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2024Article
- Patients' attitudes to bedside teaching after the COVID-19 pandemic.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Australian occupational therapists' perspectives of consumers authentically contributing to student learning during practice placements: 'It just makes sense!' but 'we need a process'.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2022Article
- Medical Education: Patients' Perspectives on Clinical Training and Informed Consent.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Observational
- Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching.BMC medical education · 2022Review
- Patient outlook on bedside teaching in a medical school.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2021Article
- Psychometric properties of the Persian version of bedside teaching (BST) Instrument.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2021Article
- Obstetrics and gynecology patients' perceptions about bedside teaching at a Saudi teaching hospital.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsler taught doctors to "have no teaching without a patient for a text, and the best teaching is that taught by the patient himself". Bedside teaching (BST) facilitates clinical practice of skills, teaches empathy, instils confidence and builds on patient-doctor relationships. However, its use has declined dramatically due to concerns regarding privacy and autonomy. Most of the research in this area concentrates on medical student or academic opinion of BST using survey based methods. This qualitative study aimed to explore the patient's experiences and opinions of BST.
methodsWith ethical approval a qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews which were examined using Thematic Analysis. Patients who had participated in a BST tutorial were invited to participate and gave written consent after discussion with a study researcher.
resultsTwenty-two patients were interviewed (obstetrics ante-natal [n = 10], obstetrics post-natal [n = 5] and gynaecology [n = 7]) ranging from ages 24-80 yrs. Four major themes were identified, with 11 sub-themes. The major themes included (i) Professional Mannerisms (ii) Privacy and Personal Wellbeing (iii) Quality of Patient Experience of BST and (iv) Clinical Experience and Learning Importance. The reaction of patients toward teaching at the bedside was altruistic and positive, with importance placed on learning.
conclusionThis research supports the concept of patient focused learning, and can reassure faculty that patients largely support its continuation as an integral component in education. Future research aims to extend this assessment to other patient groups with the aim of learning from and improving their experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.