Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293405›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Patient perspectives of bedside teaching in an obstetrics, Gynaecology and neonatology hospital.

Michelle Carty, Nicola O'Riordan, Mary Ivers, Mary F Higgins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Medical Education: Patients' Perspectives on Clinical Training and Informed Consent.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. Patient outlook on bedside teaching in a medical school.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of bedside teaching (BST) Instrument.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle CartyUCD School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Donnybrook, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Nicola O'RiordanObstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Mary IversUCD School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Donnybrook, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Mary F HigginsUCD Perinatal Research Centre, UCD School of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. mary.higgins@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsler taught doctors to "have no teaching without a patient for a text, and the best teaching is that taught by the patient himself". Bedside teaching (BST) facilitates clinical practice of skills, teaches empathy, instils confidence and builds on patient-doctor relationships. However, its use has declined dramatically due to concerns regarding privacy and autonomy. Most of the research in this area concentrates on medical student or academic opinion of BST using survey based methods. This qualitative study aimed to explore the patient's experiences and opinions of BST.

methodsWith ethical approval a qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews which were examined using Thematic Analysis. Patients who had participated in a BST tutorial were invited to participate and gave written consent after discussion with a study researcher.

resultsTwenty-two patients were interviewed (obstetrics ante-natal [n = 10], obstetrics post-natal [n = 5] and gynaecology [n = 7]) ranging from ages 24-80 yrs. Four major themes were identified, with 11 sub-themes. The major themes included (i) Professional Mannerisms (ii) Privacy and Personal Wellbeing (iii) Quality of Patient Experience of BST and (iv) Clinical Experience and Learning Importance. The reaction of patients toward teaching at the bedside was altruistic and positive, with importance placed on learning.

conclusionThis research supports the concept of patient focused learning, and can reassure faculty that patients largely support its continuation as an integral component in education. Future research aims to extend this assessment to other patient groups with the aim of learning from and improving their experience.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGynecologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeonatologyObstetricsPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionYoung AdultBedside teaching - medical educationMedical student

Identifiers

PMID32293405
PMCPMC7158153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.