Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293344›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Feasibility of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with machine learning in the assessment of necrosis of osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a preliminary study.

Bingsheng Huang, Jifei Wang, Meili Sun, Xin Chen, Danyang Xu, Zi-Ping Li, Jinting Ma, Shi-Ting Feng, Zhenhua Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Cancer Imaging.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bingsheng HuangMedical AI Lab, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jifei WangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Meili SunDepartment of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xin ChenNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Danyang XuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zi-Ping LiDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jinting MaMedical AI Lab, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Centre, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. jintingma@qq.com.
Shi-Ting FengDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. fengsht@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Zhenhua GaoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. zhenhua_gao@163.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNShenzhen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNShenzhen University Health Science Center · CN

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No. 2020A1515010571Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project No. 201903010073Medical Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, PR China A2019092National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971684, 81771908Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2011B031800096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with osteosarcoma is significant for the termination of ineffective treatment, the development of postoperative chemotherapy regimens, and the prediction of prognosis. However, histological response and tumour necrosis rate can currently be evaluated only in resected specimens after NACT. A preoperatively accurate, noninvasive, and reproducible method of response assessment to NACT is required. In this study, the value of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with machine learning for assessment of tumour necrosis after NACT for osteosarcoma was investigated.

methodsTwelve patients with primary osteosarcoma of limbs underwent NACT and received MRI examination before surgery. Postoperative tumour specimens were made corresponding to the transverse image of MRI. One hundred and two tissue samples were obtained and pathologically divided into tumour survival areas (non-cartilaginous and cartilaginous tumour viable areas) and tumour-nonviable areas (non-cartilaginous tumour necrosis areas, post-necrotic tumour collagen areas, and tumour necrotic cystic/haemorrhagic and secondary aneurismal bone cyst areas). The MRI parameters, including standardised apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, signal intensity values of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and subtract-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (ST1WI) were used to train machine learning models based on the random forest algorithm. Three classification tasks of distinguishing tumour survival, non-cartilaginous tumour survival, and cartilaginous tumour survival from tumour nonviable were evaluated by five-fold cross-validation.

resultsFor distinguishing non-cartilaginous tumour survival from tumour nonviable, the classifier constructed with ADC achieved an AUC of 0.93, while the classifier with multi-parametric MRI improved to 0.97 (P = 0.0933). For distinguishing tumour survival from tumour nonviable, the classifier with ADC achieved an AUC of 0.83, while the classifier with multi-parametric MRI improved to 0.90 (P < 0.05). For distinguishing cartilaginous tumour survival from tumour nonviable, the classifier with ADC achieved an AUC of 0.61, while the classifier with multi-parametric MRI parameters improved to 0.81(P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe combination of multi-parametric MRI and machine learning significantly improved the discriminating ability of viable cartilaginous tumour components. Our study suggests that this method may provide an objective and accurate basis for NACT response evaluation in osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMultimodal ImagingMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNecrosisNeoadjuvant TherapyOsteosarcomaPreoperative PeriodProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsMRINeoadjuvant chemotherapyOsteosarcomaRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID32293344
PMCPMC7161007
OpenAlexW3015334682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.