Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293326›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2020

Timing of kidney biopsy in type 2 diabetic patients: a stepwise approach.

Jyh-Tong Hsieh, Fu-Pang Chang, An-Hang Yang, Der-Cherng Tarng, Chih-Yu Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jyh-Tong HsiehDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Chiayi Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Fu-Pang ChangDepartment of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
An-Hang YangDepartment of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Der-Cherng TarngSchool of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Yu YangSchool of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. cyyang3@vghtpe.gov.tw.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

Ministry of Education Center for Intelligent Drug Systems and Smart Bio-devices (IDS2B)Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (TW) MOST 105-2628-B-075-008-MY3 and MOST 108-2633-B-009-001National Yang Ming University (107F-M01) Yin Yen-Liang Foundation Development and Construction PlanTaipei Veterans General Hospital (TW) V106D25-003-MY3 and VGHUST109-V5-1-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic nephropathy (DN) is the most prevalent cause of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients and is usually diagnosed clinically. A kidney biopsy is considered when non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) is suspected, such as rapid progression in renal function impairment and severe proteinuria. Still, there is yet no consensus on the timing of kidney biopsy in type 2 diabetic patients. This study aims to identify markers that can help differentiate between DN and NDRD and guide the decision of kidney biopsy.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with type 2 diabetes who received kidney biopsy from 2008 to 2017 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Ophthalmologist consultation and outpatient records, diagnosis of kidney biopsy, laboratory data, and clinical characteristics were collected.

resultsThis study enrolled 160 type 2 diabetic patients, among which 120 (75%) had isolated DN and 40 (25%) had NDRD ± DN (26 had isolated NDRD, and 14 had NDRD superimposed on DN). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, DM duration (odds ratio [OR]: 0.907; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.842-0.977; P = 0.01), diabetic retinopathy (OR: 0.196; 95% CI: 0.061-0.627; P = 0.006), and urinary RBC (OR: 1.068; 95% CI: 1.024-1.115; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of NDRD. In patients with diabetic retinopathy (n = 112, 70%), the presence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, pan-retinal photocoagulation, and hematuria were factors predicting NDRD; and in patients without diabetic retinopathy (n = 48, 30%), short DM duration and hematuria were factors predicting NDRD.

conclusionsUsing diabetic retinopathy, DM duration, and hematuria, we developed a 3-step approach to stratify patients into three categories with the different likelihoods of having NDRD. Then different strategies could be taken accordingly. Our stepwise approach is easy to follow and may serve as an appropriate and useful tool to help clinicians in making decisions of kidney biopsy in type 2 DM patients presenting with kidney diseases.

Indexed as

BiopsyHematuriaClinical Decision-MakingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKidneyKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsDiabetic nephropathyDiabetic retinopathyHematuriaKidney biopsyNon-diabetic renal disease

Identifiers

PMID32293326
PMCPMC7161016
OpenAlexW3016185075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.