Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293322›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Knowledge, and use of labour pain relief methods and associated factors among obstetric caregivers at public health centers of East Gojjam zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia: a facility based cross- sectional study.

Keralem Anteneh Bishaw, Endalew Gemechu Sendo, Workinesh Sinshaw Abebe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keralem Anteneh BishawDepartment of Midwifery, Debre-Markos University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre-Markos, Ethiopia. keralemante2010@gmail.Com.
Endalew Gemechu SendoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Addis-Ababa University, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Workinesh Sinshaw AbebeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Addis-Ababa University, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ETDebre Markos University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study was conducted in public health centers of East Gojjam Zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia. The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge, and use of labour pain relief methods and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in the study setting.

methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March 1-30, 2018. The study was conducted among three hundred and nine sampled obstetric caregivers. Structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. The data were entered into Epi-data version 4.2 Software for cleaning and exported to SPSS version 23.0 for data analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out for variables with a p-value < 0.25 in bivariate logistic regression to determine significant relationships between the dependent and independent variables. Statistical significance was determined at 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value below 0.05.

resultThe overall use of labour pain relief methods reported was 34.4%, (30.4% non-pharmacological and 8.4 pharmacological, respectively). More than half of the study participants (54.2%) had adequate knowledge about labour pain relief methods. In multivariate analysis, being a midwifery profession [AOR =2.814, 95% CI = (1.574-5.031)], having positive attitude [AOR = 4.370, 95% CI = (2.523-7.567)], and professionals with a medium level of education [AOR = 3.450, 95% CI = (1.993-5.971)] were factors significantly associated with knowledge of obstetric caregivers about labour pain relief methods. In multivariate analysis, knowledge of obstetric caregivers [AOR = 3.821, 95% CI = (2.091-6.980)], positive attitude of obstetric caregivers [AOR = 2.455, 95% CI = ((1.358-4.436))] and experience of obstetric caregivers [AOR = 2.56, 95% CI = (1.350-4.845) were factors significantly associated with the use of labour pain relief methods.

conclusionIn this study, the overall use of labour pain relief methods by obstetric caregivers was low. Systemic opioid (Pethdine) was reportedly one of the most known pharmacological pain relief methods in this study. Providers' knowledge, attitude and work experience had shown statistical significance with the use of labour pain relief methods. Task-oriented in- service training is required to fortify obstetric caregivers' knowledge and attitude towards the use of labour pain relief methods.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePain ManagementAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLabor, ObstetricLabor PainLogistic ModelsMaleMidwiferyPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEthiopiaKnowledgeLabour pain relief methodsObstetric caregivers

Identifiers

PMID32293322
PMCPMC7092537
OpenAlexW3021182029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.