Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293258›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Dissection of the mutation accumulation process during bacterial range expansions.

Lars Bosshard, Stephan Peischl, Martin Ackermann, Laurent Excoffier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Navigated range expansion promotes migratory culling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lars BosshardCMPG, Institute of Ecology an Evolution, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012, Berne, Switzerland. lars.bosshard@iee.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4550-4777
Stephan PeischlSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Martin AckermannInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zürich), 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Laurent ExcoffierCMPG, Institute of Ecology an Evolution, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012, Berne, Switzerland. laurent.excoffier@iee.unibe.ch.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030B-166605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent experimental work has shown that the evolutionary dynamics of bacteria expanding across space can differ dramatically from what we expect under well-mixed conditions. During spatial expansion, deleterious mutations can accumulate due to inefficient selection on the expansion front, potentially interfering with and modifying adaptive evolutionary processes.

resultsWe used whole genome sequencing to follow the genomic evolution of 10 mutator Escherichia coli lines during 39 days ( ~ 1650 generations) of a spatial expansion, which allowed us to gain a temporal perspective on the interaction of adaptive and non-adaptive evolutionary processes during range expansions. We used elastic net regression to infer the positive or negative effects of mutations on colony growth. The colony size, measured after three day of growth, decreased at the end of the experiment in all 10 lines, and mutations accumulated at a nearly constant rate over the whole experiment. We find evidence that beneficial mutations accumulate primarily at an early stage of the experiment, leading to a non-linear change of colony size over time. Indeed, the rate of colony size expansion remains almost constant at the beginning of the experiment and then decreases after ~ 12 days of evolution. We also find that beneficial mutations are enriched in genes encoding transport proteins, and genes coding for the membrane structure, whereas deleterious mutations show no enrichment for any biological process.

conclusionsOur experiment shows that beneficial mutations target specific biological functions mostly involved in inter or extra membrane processes, whereas deleterious mutations are randomly distributed over the whole genome. It thus appears that the interaction between genetic drift and the availability or depletion of beneficial mutations determines the change in fitness of bacterial populations during range expansion.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionGenetic FitnessBiological EvolutionCarrier ProteinsComputer SimulationEscherichia coliGene OntologyGenetic DriftMembrane ProteinsModels, GeneticMutationMutation AccumulationSelection, GeneticSilent MutationWhole Genome SequencingCarrier ProteinsMembrane ProteinsExperimental evolutionMutation loadRange expansion

Identifiers

PMID32293258
PMCPMC7092555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.