Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293243›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020

Fast parallelized sampling of Bayesian regression models for whole-genome prediction.

Tianjing Zhao, Rohan Fernando, Dorian Garrick, Hao Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianjing ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Rohan FernandoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Dorian GarrickSchool of Agriculture, Massey University, Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Hao ChengDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. qtlcheng@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5146-7231

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 018-67015-27957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBayesian regression models are widely used in genomic prediction, where the effects of all markers are estimated simultaneously by combining the information from the phenotypic data with priors for the marker effects and other parameters such as variance components or membership probabilities. Inferences from most Bayesian regression models are based on Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, where statistics are computed from a Markov chain constructed to have a stationary distribution that is equal to the posterior distribution of the unknown parameters. In practice, chains of tens of thousands steps are typically used in whole-genome Bayesian analyses, which is computationally intensive.

methodsIn this paper, we propose a fast parallelized algorithm for Bayesian regression models called independent intensive Bayesian regression models (BayesXII, "X" stands for Bayesian alphabet methods and "II" stands for "parallel") and show how the sampling of each marker effect can be made independent of samples for other marker effects within each step of the chain. This is done by augmenting the marker covariate matrix by adding p (the number of markers) new rows such that columns of the augmented marker covariate matrix are orthogonal. Ideally, the computations at each step of the MCMC chain can be accelerated by k times, where k is the number of computer processors, up to p times, where p is the number of markers.

resultsWe demonstrate the BayesXII algorithm using the prior for BayesC[Formula: see text], a Bayesian variable selection regression method, which is applied to simulated data with 50,000 individuals and a medium-density marker panel ([Formula: see text] 50,000 markers). To reach about the same accuracy as the conventional samplers for BayesC[Formula: see text] required less than 30 min using the BayesXII algorithm on 24 nodes (computer used as a server) with 24 cores on each node. In this case, the BayesXII algorithm required one tenth of the computation time of conventional samplers for BayesC[Formula: see text]. Addressing the heavy computational burden associated with Bayesian methods by parallel computing will lead to greater use of these methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationModels, StatisticalAnimalsGenome

Identifiers

PMID32293243
PMCPMC7087391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.