Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293236›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2020

Taking Charge after Stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention.

Vivian Fu, Mark Weatherall, Kathryn McPherson, William Taylor, Anna McRae, Tom Thomson, John Gommans, Geoff Green, Matire Harwood, Annemarei Ranta and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adaptive Interventions for Enhancing Participation Poststroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Do self-management interventions improve self-efficacy and health-related quality of life after stroke? A systematic review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Theory-Based Self-Management Interventions for Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Longer term patient management following stroke: A systematic review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Variability in Stroke Journeys: A Qualitative Study of Experiences of Persons With Stroke.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Vivian Fu194581Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mark WeatherallDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Kathryn McPherson340836Health Research Council of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
William TaylorRehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Anna McRae1387Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tom Thomson5178Hutt Valley District Health Board, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
John GommansHawkes Bay District Health Board, Hastings, New Zealand.
Geoff GreenCounties-Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Matire HarwoodTe Kupenga Hauora Māori, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Annemarei RantaDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3223-3330
Carl Hanger63588Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7952-3936
Judith Riley194581Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Harry McNaughton194581Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3030-6062
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZUniversity of Otago · NZAuckland District Health Board · NZCanterbury District Health Board · NZCounties Manukau District Health Board · NZHawke's Bay Hospital · NZHealth Research Council of New Zealand · NZHutt Hospital · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purpose"Take Charge" is a novel, community-based self-directed rehabilitation intervention which helps a person with stroke take charge of their own recovery. In a previous randomized controlled trial, a single Take Charge session improved independence and health-related quality of life 12 months following stroke in Māori and Pacific New Zealanders. We tested the same intervention in three doses (zero, one, or two sessions) in a larger study and in a broader non-Māori and non-Pacific population with stroke. We aimed to confirm whether the Take Charge intervention improved quality of life at 12 months after stroke in a different population and whether two sessions were more effective than one.

methodsWe randomized 400 people within 16 weeks of acute stroke who had been discharged to institution-free community living at seven centers in New Zealand to a single Take Charge session (TC1, n = 132), two Take Charge sessions six weeks apart (TC2, n = 138), or a control intervention (n = 130). Take Charge is a "talking therapy" that encourages a sense of purpose, autonomy, mastery, and connectedness with others. The primary outcome was the Physical Component Summary score of the Short Form 36 at 12 months following stroke comparing any Take Charge intervention to control.

resultsOf the 400 people randomized (mean age 72.2 years, 58.5% male), 10 died and two withdrew from the study. The remaining 388 (97%) people were followed up at 12 months after stroke. Twelve months following stroke, participants in either of the TC groups (i.e. TC1 + TC2) scored 2.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.95 to 4.9, p = 0.004) points higher (better) than control on the Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary. This difference remained significant when adjusted for pre-specified baseline variables. There was a dose effect with Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary scores increasing by 1.9 points (95% CI 0.8 to 3.1, p < 0.001) for each extra Take Charge session received. Exposure to the Take Charge intervention was associated with reduced odds of being dependent (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 5) at 12 months (TC1 + TC2 12% versus control 19.5%, odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.99, p = 0.045).

conclusionsConfirming the previous randomized controlled trial outcome, Take Charge-a low-cost, person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention after stroke-improved health-related quality of life and independence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION-URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12615001163594.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandQuality of LifeRehabilitation Centerspatient-centeredself-managementStroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32293236
PMCPMC7739137
OpenAlexW3016014299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.