ReviewPhysiology (Bethesda, Md.)2020
Differences and Similarities: The Richness of Comparative Sperm Physiology.
Review in Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Shedding: Conserved Retention of ZAN After the Acrosome Reaction Across Rabbit, Boar, and Bull Sperm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Soluble adenylyl cyclase in nonmammalian sperm is directly controlled by pH, not by HCOProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- A framework for evaluating predicted sperm trajectories in crowded microscopy videos.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- From localization to function: comparative analysis of CB1 in sperm across species and its epigenetic role in humans.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Effect of Capacitation on Proteomic Profile and Mitochondrial Parameters of Spermatozoa in Bulls.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Modeling diffusive search by non-adaptive sperm: Empirical and computational insights.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Intracytoplasmic sperm injection induces transgenerational abnormalities in mice.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- Article
- Control of intracellular pH and bicarbonate by CONature communications · 2023Article
- Characterization of a sperm motility signalling pathway in a gonochoric coral suggests conservation across cnidarian sexual systems.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Review
- Time-Lapse Flow Cytometry: A Robust Tool to Assess Physiological Parameters Related to the Fertilizing Capability of Human Sperm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- The role of oxidative stress in postcopulatory selection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
- Physiology in Perspective: In a World of Social Distancing.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species preservation depends on the success of fertilization. Sperm are uniquely equipped to fulfill this task, and, although several mechanisms are conserved among species, striking functional differences have evolved to contend with particular sperm-egg environmental characteristics. This review highlights similarities and differences in sperm strategies, with examples within internal and external fertilizers, pointing out unresolved issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.