Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293116›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2020

Reconstructed human skin shows epidermal invagination towards integrated neopapillae indicating early hair follicle formation in vitro.

Irit Vahav, Lenie J van den Broek, Maria Thon, Hanneke N Monsuur, Sander W Spiekstra, Beren Atac, Rik J Scheper, Roland Lauster, Gerd Lindner, Uwe Marx and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GPRC6A-Duox1 Axis Regulates the Hair Cycle Through HTissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Biofabrication of Human Skin with Its Appendages.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Irit VahavTissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Lenie J van den BroekDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria ThonDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke N MonsuurDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander W SpiekstraDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Beren AtacTissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Rik J ScheperA-Skin BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roland LausterDepartment of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gerd LindnerTissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Uwe MarxTissUse GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Susan GibbsDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3446-6138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Application of reconstructed human Skin (RhS) is a promising approach for the treatment of extensive wounds and for drug efficacy and safety testing. However, incorporating appendages, such as hair follicles, into RhS still remains a challenge. The hair follicle plays a critical role in thermal regulation, dispersion of sweat and sebum, sensory and tactile functions, skin regeneration, and repigmentation. The aim of this study was to determine whether human neopapilla could be incorporated into RhS (differentiated epidermis on fibroblast and endothelial cell populated dermis) and whether the neopapillae maintain their inductive follicular properties in vitro. Neopapillae spheroids, constructed from expanded and self-aggregating dermal papilla cells, synthesized extracellular matrix typically found in follicular papillae. Compared with dermal fibroblasts, neopapillae showed increased expression of multiple genes (Wnt5a, Wnt10b, and LEF1) known to regulate hair development and also increased secretion of CXCL1, which is a strong keratinocyte chemoattractant. When neopapillae were incorporated into the dermis of RhS, they stimulated epidermal down-growth resulting in engulfment of the neopapillae sphere. Similar to the native hair follicle, the differentiated invaginating epidermis inner side was keratin 10 positive and the undifferentiated outer side keratin 10 negative. The outer side was keratin 15 positive confirming the undifferentiated nature of these keratinocytes aligning a newly formed collagen IV, laminin V positive basement membrane within the hydrogel. In conclusion, we describe a RhS model containing neopapillae with hair follicle-inductive properties. Importantly, epidermal invagination occurred to engulf the neopapillae, thus demonstrating in vitro the first steps towards hair follicle morphogenesis in RhS.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedEndothelial CellsFibroblastsHair FollicleHumansMaleSpheroids, Cellularepidermishair folliclein vitroneopapillaereconstructed human skinregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID32293116
PMCPMC7317351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.