Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293072›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Discriminating stress from rest based on resting-state connectivity of the human brain: A supervised machine learning study.

Wei Zhang, Alberto Llera, Mahur M Hashemi, Reinoud Kaldewaij, Saskia B J Koch, Christian F Beckmann, Floris Klumpers, Karin Roelofs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Independent Filter Analysis for Group Discrimination in fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Circulating PACAP levels are associated with increased amygdala-default mode network resting-state connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The glucocorticoid footprint on the memory engram.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei ZhangDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-2033
Alberto LleraDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mahur M HashemiDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Reinoud KaldewaijDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saskia B J KochDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Christian F BeckmannDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Floris KlumpersDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karin RoelofsDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute stress induces large-scale neural reorganization with relevance to stress-related psychopathology. Here, we applied a novel supervised machine learning method, combining the strengths of a priori theoretical insights with a data-driven approach, to identify which connectivity changes are most prominently associated with a state of acute stress and individual differences therein. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were taken from 334 healthy participants (79 females) before and after a formal stress induction. For each individual scan, mean time-series were extracted from 46 functional parcels of three major brain networks previously shown to be potentially sensitive to stress effects (default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN), and executive control networks). A data-driven approach was then used to obtain discriminative spatial linear filters that classified the pre- and post-stress scans. To assess potential relevance for understanding individual differences, probability of classification using the most discriminative filters was linked to individual cortisol stress responses. Our model correctly classified pre- versus post-stress states with highly significant accuracy (above 75%; leave-one-out validation relative to chance performance). Discrimination between pre- and post-stress states was mainly based on connectivity changes in regions from the SN and DMN, including the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus. Interestingly, the probability of classification using these connectivity changes were associated with individual cortisol increases. Our results confirm the involvement of DMN and SN using a data-driven approach, and specifically single out key regions that might receive additional attention in future studies for their relevance also for individual differences.

Indexed as

AmygdalaConnectomeDefault Mode NetworkGyrus CinguliNerve NetParietal LobeStress, PsychologicalSupervised Machine LearningAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleacute stressdefault mode networkfunctional connectivitymachine learningresting-state functional magnetic resonance imagingsalience networkstress effects

Identifiers

PMID32293072
PMCPMC7336146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.