Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32293006›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2020

Automation of cleaning and reconstructing residential address histories to assign environmental exposures in longitudinal studies.

Daniela Fecht, Kevin Garwood, Oliver Butters, John Henderson, Paul Elliott, Anna L Hansell, John Gulliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Strategies for ascertaining timing of address changes in administrative data.International journal of population data science · 2025
    Article
  5. Trimester effects of source-specific PMEnvironmental health : a global access science source · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Small-area methods for investigation of environment and health.International journal of epidemiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniela FechtUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment & Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kevin GarwoodUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment & Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Oliver ButtersAvon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
John HendersonAvon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Paul ElliottUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment & Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anna L HansellUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment & Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
John GulliverUK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment & Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700920Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have developed an open-source ALgorithm for Generating Address Exposures (ALGAE) that cleans residential address records to construct address histories and assign spatially-determined exposures to cohort participants. The first application of this algorithm was to construct prenatal and early life air pollution exposure for individuals of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the South West of England, using previously estimated particulate matter ≤10  µm (PM10) concentrations.

methodsALSPAC recruited 14 541 pregnant women between 1991 and 1992. We assigned trimester-specific estimated PM10 exposures for 12 752 pregnancies, and first year of life exposures for 12 525 births, based on maternal residence and residential mobility.

resultsAverage PM10 exposure was 32.6  µg/m3 [standard deviation (S.D.) 3.0  µg/m3] during pregnancy and 31.4 µg/m3 (S.D. 2.6  µg/m3) during the first year of life; 6.7% of women changed address during pregnancy, and 18.0% moved during first year of life of their infant. Exposure differences ranged from -5.3  µg/m3 to 12.4  µg/m3 (up to 26% difference) during pregnancy and -7.22  µg/m3 to 7.64  µg/m3 (up to 27% difference) in the first year of life, when comparing estimated exposure using the address at birth and that assessed using the complete cleaned address history. For the majority of individuals exposure changed by <5%, but some relatively large changes were seen both in pregnancy and in infancy.

conclusionsALGAE provides a generic and adaptable, open-source solution to clean addresses stored in a cohort contact database and assign life stage-specific exposure estimates with the potential to reduce exposure misclassification.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEnvironmental ExposureResidence CharacteristicsAir PollutionEnglandFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaternal ExposureParticulate MatterPregnancyParticulate Matterair pollutioncohort studiesexposure measurement errorpregnancyreproductive healthResidential mobility

Identifiers

PMID32293006
PMCPMC7158063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.