Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32292920›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2020

Meat analog as future food: a review.

Ishamri Ismail, Young-Hwa Hwang, Seon-Tea Joo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07104461 (A Single-blind Randomised Study to Test the Effects of Protein-enriched Breakfast Meals With Varying Protein Sources Compared to a Standard Meal on the Regulation of Appetite and Satiety in Healthy Human Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07104461 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Single-blind Randomised Study to Test the Effects of Protein-enriched Breakfast Meals With Varying Protein Sources Compared to a Standard Meal on the Regulation of Appetite and Satiety in Healthy Human Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WestminsterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled12ConditionsAppetite and General Nutritional DisordersArmsOat porridge, Whey protein isolate, Potato protein isolate, Meal replacement shake
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ishamri IsmailDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21+), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4820-8292
Young-Hwa HwangInstitute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3687-3535
Seon-Tea JooDivision of Applied Life Science (BK21+), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-2828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition of meat analog refers to the replacement of the main ingredient with other than meat. It also called a meat substitute, meat alternatives, fake or mock meat, and imitation meat. The increased importance of meat analog in the current trend is due to the health awareness among consumers in their diet and for a better future environment. The factors that lead to this shift is due to low fat and calorie foods intake, flexitarians, animal disease, natural resources depletion, and to reduce greenhouse gas emission. Currently, available marketed meat analog products are plant-based meat in which the quality (i.e., texture and taste) are similar to the conventional meat. The ingredients used are mainly soy proteins with novel ingredients added, such as mycoprotein and soy leghemoglobin. However, plant-based meat is sold primarily in Western countries. Asian countries also will become a potential market in the near future due to growing interest in this product. With the current advance technology, lab-grown meat with no livestock raising or known as cultured meat will be expected to boost the food market in the future. Also, insect-based products will be promising to be the next protein resource for human food. Nevertheless, other than acceptability, cost-effective, reliable production, and consistent quality towards those products, product safety is the top priority. Therefore, the regulatory frameworks need to be developed alongside.

Indexed as

Cultured meatFuture foodInsectMeat analogPlant-based meat

Identifiers

PMID32292920
PMCPMC7142285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.