ArticleJACC. Case reports2020
The Kardashian Index of Cardiologists: Celebrities or Experts?
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician-scientists or celebrities? Kardashian-index of gastroenterologists.World journal of methodology · 2023Article
- Guidelines: The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources.Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
- Twitter trends in #Parasitology determined by text mining and topic modelling.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023Article
- Researchers in cardiology - Why and how to get on Twitter?International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Review
- The Kardashian index of cardiologists: Do more social media followers mean more citations or merely celebrity status in academia?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Mapping and quantification of the twitter footprint of cardiologists.European heart journal. Digital health · 2021Article
- Social media in surgery: evolving role in research communication and beyond.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Review
- Article-Level Metrics.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Review
- Impact of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Social Media: Does Science Trend As Much As Everyday Events?World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- [Twitter in cardiology : Tips and tricks].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2020Review
- The Kardashian index of interventional neuroradiologists: measuring discrepant social media influence.The neuroradiology journal · 2020Article
- From Cynic to Advocate: The Use of Twitter in Cardiology.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Article
- A Short History of Free Open Access Medical Education. The Past, Present, and Future.ATS scholar · 2020Article
- Reply: The Social Media Kardashian Index: A Stagnant Measure for an Innovative Platform.JACC. Case reports · 2020Article
- The Social Media Kardashian Index: A Stagnant Measure for an Innovative Platform.JACC. Case reports · 2020Article
- Understanding the Analytics of Twitter in Cardiovascular Medicine.JACC. Case reports · 2020Article
- A Perspective on the K-Index.JACC. Case reports · 2020Article
- Social Media and Assessing the "Impact" of Medical Publications.JACC. Case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.