ReviewPreventive nutrition and food science2020
A Review of Recent Evidence from Meal-Based Diet Interventions and Clinical Biomarkers for Improvement of Glucose Regulation.
Review in Preventive nutrition and food science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary Modulation of Metabolic Health: From Bioactive Compounds to Personalized Nutrition.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Shear wave elastography of the supraspinatus tendon with early degeneration in asymptomatic type II diabetes mellitus patients: a multicenter study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Effects of Fruit and Vegetable Polyphenols on the Glycemic Control and Metabolic Parameters in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2022Review
- Appraisal of Triglyceride-Related Markers as Early Predictors of Metabolic Outcomes in the PREVIEW Lifestyle Intervention: A ControlledFrontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Human postprandial responses to food and potential for precision nutrition.Nature medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, the prevalence of diabetes has rapidly increased worldwide. Medical nutrition therapy has been identified as a major therapeutic support for diabetic patients, while preventive strategies in prediabetic or high-risk individuals have mainly focused on supplementation with bioactive compounds. Recently, meal-based interventions have been investigated as novel and safe long-term strategies for improving glucose regulation. However, evaluation of meal-based interventions is difficult since it requires analysis of sensitive markers. Biomarkers can also be used to identify individuals at risk for diabetes, which is important for disease prevention. In this review, we summarize current evidence from meal-based intervention studies conducted with the aim of improving glucose homeostasis in individuals at risk of diabetes using clinical biomarkers currently used to assess diabetic risk. Very low-calorie diets have significantly improved glucose regulation in obese adults and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In particular, changing the ratios of macronutrients through calorie restriction reduces fasting glucose level and hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with diabetes mellitus. However, this effect is limited in both obese and healthy adults. To date, multiple glucose-related markers have been identified as clinical biomarkers of diabetes. Additional clinical biomarkers include cholesterol levels, hematological markers, and inflammatory markers. Taken together, the evidence presented in this review may help for selection of clinical biomarkers for meal-based preventive approaches for non- or pre-diabetic individuals to prevent onset of diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.