Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32292624›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2020

Quantitative computed tomography analysis for stratifying the severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Cong Shen, Nan Yu, Shubo Cai, Jie Zhou, Jiexin Sheng, Kang Liu, Heping Zhou, Youmin Guo, Gang Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Efficient COVID-19 super pixel segmentation algorithm using MCFO-based SLIC.Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cong ShenDepartment of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Nan YuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, 712000, Shaanxi, China.
Shubo CaiDepartment of Radiology, Xi'an Chest Hospital, Xi'an, 710100, Shaanxi, China.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Xi'an Chest Hospital, Xi'an, 710100, Shaanxi, China.
Jiexin ShengDepartment of Radiology, Hanzhong Central Hospital, Hanzhong, 723000, Shaanxi, China.
Kang LiuDepartment of CT&MR Imaging, Weinan Central Hospital, Weinan, 714000, Shaanxi, China.
Heping ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Ankang Central Hospital, Ankang, 725000, Shaanxi, China.
Youmin GuoDepartment of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Gang NiuDepartment of Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the feasibility of using a computer tool for stratifying the severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on computed tomography (CT) images. We retrospectively examined 44 confirmed COVID-19 cases. All cases were evaluated separately by radiologists (visually) and through an in-house computer software. The degree of lesions was visually scored by the radiologist, as follows, for each of the 5 lung lobes: 0, no lesion present; 1, <1/3 involvement; 2, >1/3 and < 2/3 involvement; and 3, >2/3 involvement. Lesion density was assessed based on the proportion of ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation and fibrosis of the lesions. The parameters obtained using the computer tool included lung volume (mL), lesion volume (mL), lesion percentage (%), and mean lesion density (HU) of the whole lung, right lung, left lung, and each lobe. The scores obtained by the radiologists and quantitative results generated by the computer software were tested for correlation. A Chi-square test was used to test the consistency of radiologist- and computer-derived lesion percentage in the right/left lung, upper/lower lobe, and each of the 5 lobes. The results showed a strong to moderate correlation between lesion percentage scores obtained by radiologists and the computer software (

Indexed as

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Quantitative computed tomography (QCT)Severity stratification

Identifiers

PMID32292624
PMCPMC7102584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.