Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32292539›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2020

Importance of Quantifying Drug-Target Engagement in Cells.

Jakub Stefaniak, Kilian V M Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Target Engagement Assays in Early Drug Discovery.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ligand-Based Competition Binding by Real-TimeJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Theranostics · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jakub StefaniakStructural Genomics Consortium, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, U.K.
Kilian V M HuberStructural Genomics Consortium, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring and quantifying the binding of a drug to a protein target inside living cells and thereby correlating biochemical or biophysical activity with target engagement in cells or tissue represents a key step in target validation and drug development. A prototypic target engagement assay should allow for unbiased determination of small molecule-protein interactions in order to confirm cellular mechanism-of-action (MoA) while avoiding major artificial perturbations of cellular homeostasis and integrity. Recently, several new additions to the chemical biology toolbox have expanded our ability to study drug action in intact cells and enabled surveying of intracellular residence time and binding kinetics, which are particularly important for potent receptor ligands and therapeutic moieties with limited therapeutic index.

Identifiers

PMID32292539
PMCPMC7153009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.