Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32292337›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2020

A Practical Guide to Using CV Analysis for Determining the Locus of Synaptic Plasticity.

Jennifer A Brock, Aurore Thomazeau, Airi Watanabe, Sally Si Ying Li, P Jesper Sjöström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On variability in local field potentials.Communications biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mitogen-activated protein kinase dependent presynaptic potentiation in the lateral habenula mediates depressive-like behaviors in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Glutamate Spillover Dynamically Strengthens Gabaergic Synaptic Inhibition of the Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Altered Thalamocortical Signaling in a Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer A BrockCentre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Department of Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Aurore ThomazeauCentre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Department of Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Airi WatanabeCentre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Department of Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sally Si Ying LiSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
P Jesper SjöströmCentre for Research in Neuroscience, Brain Repair and Integrative Neuroscience Program, Department of Medicine, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term synaptic plasticity is widely believed to underlie learning and memory in the brain. Whether plasticity is primarily expressed pre- or postsynaptically has been the subject of considerable debate for many decades. More recently, it is generally agreed that the locus of plasticity depends on a number of factors, such as developmental stage, induction protocol, and synapse type. Since presynaptic expression alters not just the gain but also the short-term dynamics of a synapse, whereas postsynaptic expression only modifies the gain, the locus has fundamental implications for circuits dynamics and computations in the brain. It therefore remains crucial for our understanding of neuronal circuits to know the locus of expression of long-term plasticity. One classical method for elucidating whether plasticity is pre- or postsynaptically expressed is based on analysis of the coefficient of variation (CV), which serves as a measure of noise levels of synaptic neurotransmission. Here, we provide a practical guide to using CV analysis for the purposes of exploring the locus of expression of long-term plasticity, primarily aimed at beginners in the field. We provide relatively simple intuitive background to an otherwise theoretically complex approach as well as simple mathematical derivations for key parametric relationships. We list important pitfalls of the method, accompanied by accessible computer simulations to better illustrate the problems (downloadable from GitHub), and we provide straightforward solutions for these issues.

Indexed as

electrophysiologylong-term depressionlong-term plasticitylong-term potentiationmonosynaptic connectionspaired recordingsspike-timing-dependent plasticity

Identifiers

PMID32292337
PMCPMC7118219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.