Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2020
The Impact of a Tablet App on Adherence to American Heart Association Guidelines During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of a Shared Decision-making mHealth Tool on Caregivers' Team Situational Awareness, Communication Effectiveness, and Performance During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Tele-Support for Emergency Medical Technicians Dealing with Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: a Randomized, Simulation-based Study
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of cognitive aids on resuscitation performance in in-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of an app-guided advanced cardiac life support algorithm on teamwork, non-technical skills, and workload in simulated in-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled feasibility trial.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Trial
- Effect of a Mobile App on Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: PEDIDOSIS App vs. Conventional Methods. A Multicenter Simulation-based Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical systems · 2026Trial
- Augmented Reality-Guided Decision Support in Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of a Novel Tablet Application in Reducing Guideline Deviations During Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Distribution of visual attention amongst clinicians using an augmented reality-based decision support system during simulated cardiac arrest - A descriptive study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Impact of an augmented reality-based decision support system on teamwork, leadership, provider workload and cognitive load during simulated cardiac arrest - a simulation-based randomized controlled trial.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Shared Decision Support Tool for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest: Mixed Methods Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Overview of a User-Centered, Mixed-Methods Process for Designing Interconnected and Focused Mobile Applications on Patient Care Environment (InterFACE): Augmented-Reality Decision Support System for Pediatric Resuscitation.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Perceived Usability, User Experience, and Technology Acceptance of Role-Specific Augmented Reality Decision Support Tools for Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation: Prospective Observational Pilot Study.JMIR XR and spatial computing · 2026Article
- Getting ON-TRAC, a team-centred design study of a reflexivity aid to support resuscitation teams' information sharing.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Health Communication Strategies in Nursing: A Mixed Methods Study of Internet, mHealth, and Social Media Versus Traditional Methods.JMIR nursing · 2024Article
- ChatGPT's Performance in Cardiac Arrest and Bradycardia Simulations Using the American Heart Association's Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Guidelines: Exploratory Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Article
- Development and Use of a Cardiac Clinical Guideline Mobile App in Australia: Acceptability and Multi-Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Adherence to guideline recommendations in the management of pediatric cardiac arrest: a multicentre observational simulation-based study.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2022Article
- Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of clinical literature from 2020.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Automated Size Recognition in Pediatric Emergencies Using Machine Learning and Augmented Reality: Within-Group Comparative Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Mobile Electronic Devices as Means of Facilitating Patient Activation and Health Professional Empowerment Related to Information Seeking on Chronic Conditions and Medications: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Mobile app helps trainees manage emergencies at the bedside.AEM education and training · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based best practices are the cornerstone to guide optimal cardiopulmonary arrest resuscitation care. Adherence to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) optimizes the management of critically ill patients and increases their chances of survival after cardiac arrest. Despite advances in resuscitation science and survival improvement over the last decades, only approximately 38% of children survive to hospital discharge after in-hospital cardiac arrest and only 6%-20% after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
objectiveWe investigated whether a mobile app developed as a guide to support and drive CPR providers in real time through interactive pediatric advanced life support (PALS) algorithms would increase adherence to AHA guidelines and reduce the time to initiation of critical life-saving maneuvers compared to the use of PALS pocket reference cards.
methodsThis study was a randomized controlled trial conducted during a simulation-based pediatric cardiac arrest scenario caused by pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT). A total of 26 pediatric residents were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was the elapsed time in seconds in each allocation group from the onset of pVT to the first defibrillation attempt. Secondary outcomes were time elapsed to (1) initiation of chest compression, (2) subsequent defibrillation attempts, and (3) administration of drugs, including the time intervals between defibrillation attempts and drug doses, shock doses, and the number of shocks. All outcomes were assessed for deviation from AHA guidelines.
resultsMean time to the first defibrillation attempt (121.4 sec, 95% CI 105.3-137.5) was significantly reduced among residents using the app compared to those using PALS pocket cards (211.5 sec, 95% CI 162.5-260.6, P<.001). With the app, 11 out of 13 (85%) residents initiated chest compressions within 60 seconds from the onset of pVT and 12 out of 13 (92%) successfully defibrillated within 180 seconds. Time to all other defibrillation attempts was reduced with the app. Adherence to the 2018 AHA pVT algorithm improved by approximately 70% (P=.001) when using the app following all CPR sequences of action in a stepwise fashion until return of spontaneous circulation. The pVT rhythm was recognized correctly in 51 out of 52 (98%) opportunities among residents using the app compared to only 19 out of 52 (37%) among those using PALS cards (P<.001). Time to epinephrine injection was similar. Among a total of 78 opportunities, incorrect shock or drug doses occurred in 14% (11/78) of cases among those using the cards. These errors were reduced to 1% (1/78, P=.005) when using the app.
conclusionsUse of the mobile app was associated with a shorter time to first and subsequent defibrillation attempts, fewer medication and defibrillation dose errors, and improved adherence to AHA recommendations compared with the use of PALS pocket cards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.