Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32292179›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2020

The Impact of a Tablet App on Adherence to American Heart Association Guidelines During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Johan N Siebert, Laurence Lacroix, Aymeric Cantais, Sergio Manzano, Frederic Ehrler

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04464603 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Shared Decision-making mHealth Tool on Caregivers' Team Situational Awareness, Communication Effectiveness, and Performance During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPediatric Clinical Research PlatformRan2025 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsCardiopulmonary Arrest, Pediatric ALL, ResuscitationArmsInterFACE (mHealth tool), Conventional methods
NCT06362850 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Tele-Support for Emergency Medical Technicians Dealing with Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: a Randomized, Simulation-based Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsCardiac ArrestArmsTele-support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Adherence to guideline recommendations in the management of pediatric cardiac arrest: a multicentre observational simulation-based study.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of clinical literature from 2020.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johan N SiebertDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-3382
Laurence LacroixDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6636-3344
Aymeric CantaisPediatric Emergency Department, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8650-2129
Sergio ManzanoDepartment of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9603-5520
Frederic EhrlerDiagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9734-3242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based best practices are the cornerstone to guide optimal cardiopulmonary arrest resuscitation care. Adherence to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) optimizes the management of critically ill patients and increases their chances of survival after cardiac arrest. Despite advances in resuscitation science and survival improvement over the last decades, only approximately 38% of children survive to hospital discharge after in-hospital cardiac arrest and only 6%-20% after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

objectiveWe investigated whether a mobile app developed as a guide to support and drive CPR providers in real time through interactive pediatric advanced life support (PALS) algorithms would increase adherence to AHA guidelines and reduce the time to initiation of critical life-saving maneuvers compared to the use of PALS pocket reference cards.

methodsThis study was a randomized controlled trial conducted during a simulation-based pediatric cardiac arrest scenario caused by pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT). A total of 26 pediatric residents were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was the elapsed time in seconds in each allocation group from the onset of pVT to the first defibrillation attempt. Secondary outcomes were time elapsed to (1) initiation of chest compression, (2) subsequent defibrillation attempts, and (3) administration of drugs, including the time intervals between defibrillation attempts and drug doses, shock doses, and the number of shocks. All outcomes were assessed for deviation from AHA guidelines.

resultsMean time to the first defibrillation attempt (121.4 sec, 95% CI 105.3-137.5) was significantly reduced among residents using the app compared to those using PALS pocket cards (211.5 sec, 95% CI 162.5-260.6, P<.001). With the app, 11 out of 13 (85%) residents initiated chest compressions within 60 seconds from the onset of pVT and 12 out of 13 (92%) successfully defibrillated within 180 seconds. Time to all other defibrillation attempts was reduced with the app. Adherence to the 2018 AHA pVT algorithm improved by approximately 70% (P=.001) when using the app following all CPR sequences of action in a stepwise fashion until return of spontaneous circulation. The pVT rhythm was recognized correctly in 51 out of 52 (98%) opportunities among residents using the app compared to only 19 out of 52 (37%) among those using PALS cards (P<.001). Time to epinephrine injection was similar. Among a total of 78 opportunities, incorrect shock or drug doses occurred in 14% (11/78) of cases among those using the cards. These errors were reduced to 1% (1/78, P=.005) when using the app.

conclusionsUse of the mobile app was associated with a shorter time to first and subsequent defibrillation attempts, fewer medication and defibrillation dose errors, and improved adherence to AHA recommendations compared with the use of PALS pocket cards.

Indexed as

American Heart AssociationCardiopulmonary ResuscitationChildEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsTreatment Adherence and ComplianceUnited Statesbiomedical technologiesemergency medicineguideline adherencemobile appspediatricsresuscitation

Identifiers

PMID32292179
PMCPMC7287744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.