Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32291586›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2020

Strategic encoding and enhanced memory for positive value-location associations.

Shawn T Schwartz, Alexander L M Siegel, Alan D Castel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Serial and strategic memory processes in younger and older adults.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shawn T Schwartz1285 Psychology Tower, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. shawnschwartz@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6444-8451
Alexander L M Siegel1285 Psychology Tower, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-4461
Alan D Castel1285 Psychology Tower, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1965-8227

Funding

Goals and Motivation to Remember Important Information in Old AgeR01AG044335 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CASTEL, ALAN D · 2013 to 2025
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People often need to remember the location of important objects or events, and also to remember locations that are associated with negative objects. In the current study, we examined how both positive and negative items might be selectively remembered in the visuospatial domain. Participants studied number-items ranging from -25 to +25 indicating point values in a grid display and were instructed to maximize their score (a summation of correctly remembered positive and negative information; incorrectly placed negative items resulted in a subtraction from the overall score). Items were presented in a sequential, simultaneous (Experiment 1), or self-regulated format (Experiment 2) where participants controlled which items to study and the length of study time per item. In Experiment 1, participants selectively recalled high-magnitude over low-magnitude items, but also displayed a positivity preference in memory. In Experiment 2, we were able to determine whether this positivity preference was a result of bottom-up, automatic, or top-down strategic processes. Results indicated that participants explicitly chose to study positive items more frequently and for more total time relative to negative items, suggesting a deliberate strategy to focus on positive information. This bias for highly positive information suggests an overt points-gained approach, as opposed to a loss-aversion approach, to remembering value in the visuospatial domain.

Indexed as

AttentionMental RecallCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMotivationTime FactorsYoung AdultAssociative memoryNegativityPositivityPresentation formatVisuospatial memory

Identifiers

PMID32291586
PMCPMC7387219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.