Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32291570›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020

Survival Benefits of Second-line Axitinib Versus Everolimus After First Line Sunitinib Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Lajos Géczi, György Bodoky, György Rokszin, Ibolya Fábián, László Torday

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lajos GécziUrogenital Tumors and Clinical Pharmacology Department, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122, Budapest, Hungary. gelajos@oncol.hu.
György BodokyDepartment of Oncology, Szent László Hospital, Albert Flórián út 5, 1097, Budapest, Hungary.
György RokszinRxTarget Ltd, Bacsó Nándor út 10, 5000, Szolnok, Hungary.
Ibolya FábiánRxTarget Ltd, Bacsó Nándor út 10, 5000, Szolnok, Hungary.
László TordayDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi fasor 12, 6720, Szeged, Hungary.
National Institute of Oncology · HUUnified Szent István and Szent László Hospital · HUUniversity of Szeged · HUUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted therapies significantly improve clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Several new agents have been approved for first- and second-line use. However, there is a lack of compelling evidence comparing sequencing strategies, and available comparative data regarding the real-world effectiveness of different therapeutic sequences are limited. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified mRCC patients who initiated targeted therapy between January 1, 2008 and May 31, 2017 from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database of Hungary. Overall survival (OS) and duration of first-line treatment (DFT) were obtained for patients receiving sunitinib-everolimus, sunitinib-axitinib, or pazopanib-everolimus treatment sequences. OS of sunitinib-everolimus and sunitinib-axitinib sequences was also determined for patients having better or worse response to sunitinib first-line therapy.

resultsMedian OS was significantly longer among patients treated with sunitinib-axitinib compared to those receiving sunitinib-everolimus. Median DFT was also significantly longer in the sunitinib-axitinib vs. sunitinib-everolimus group. Sunitinib-axitinib was associated with significantly longer median OS compared to sunitinib-everolimus in patients with better response to first-line sunitinib in the pooled sunitinib population. In patients with worse response to sunitinib, sunitinib-axitinib was associated with a trend towards greater OS compared to sunitinib-everolimus, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionsIn this nationwide database analysis, mRCC patients treated with the sunitinib-axitinib sequence had significantly longer OS compared to those receiving sunitinib-everolimus therapy. The OS benefits of second-line axitinib were consistent among patients with better response to sunitinib defined by DFT values.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAxitinibCarcinoma, Renal CellEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSunitinibSurvival RateAxitinibEverolimusSunitinibAxitinibMetastatic renal cell carcinomaOverall survivalSequential therapyVEGF inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32291570
PMCPMC7471136
OpenAlexW3015966552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.