ArticleNeuroinformatics2020
Human Brain Atlases in Stroke Management.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Taxonomy of Acute Stroke: Imaging, Processing, and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Clinical Trial Protocol for BEACH: A Phase 2a Study of MW189 in Patients with Acute Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- A Brief History of Stereotactic Atlases: Their Evolution and Importance in Stereotactic Neurosurgery.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Towards an Architecture of a Multi-purpose, User-Extendable Reference Human Brain Atlas.Neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Traumatic Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Feature Extraction Based on Variable Model Algorithm in Stroke Examination.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Evolution of Human Brain Atlases in Terms of Content, Applications, Functionality, and Availability.Neuroinformatics · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and a major cause of permanent disability. Its management is demanding because of variety of protocols, imaging modalities, pulse sequences, hemodynamic maps, criteria for treatment, and time constraints to promptly evaluate and treat. To cope with some of these issues, we propose novel, patented solutions in stroke management by employing multiple brain atlases for diagnosis, treatment, and prediction. Numerous and diverse CT and MRI scans are used: ARIC cohort, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke CT cases, MRI cases with multiple pulse sequences, and 128 stroke CT patients, each with 170 variables and one year follow-up. The method employs brain atlases of anatomy, blood supply territories, and probabilistic stroke atlas. It rapidly maps an atlas to scan and provides atlas-assisted scan processing. Atlas-to-scan mapping is application-dependent and handles three types of regions of interest (ROIs): atlas-defined ROIs, atlas-quantified ROIs, and ROIs creating an atlas. An ROI is defined by atlas-guided anatomy or scan-derived pathology. The atlas defines ROI or quantifies it. A brain atlas potential has been illustrated in four atlas-assisted applications for stroke occurrence prediction and screening, rapid and automatic stroke diagnosis in emergency room, quantitative decision support in thrombolysis in ischemic stroke, and stroke outcome prediction and treatment assessment. The use of brain atlases in stroke has many potential advantages, including rapid processing, automated and robust handling, wide range of applications, and quantitative assessment. Further work is needed to enhance the developed prototypes, clinically validate proposed solutions, and introduce them to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.