Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32291545›Full record

ArticleJournal of abnormal child psychology2020

U.S. Child Behavioral Health Quality Measures: Advancing a National Research Agenda.

Bonnie T Zima

Abstract readConference Proceedings
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bonnie T ZimaUCLA-Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bzima@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5542-1879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is based on the keynote presentation for the biennial meeting of the International Society for Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (ISRCAP) in Los Angeles, California. The topic was purposively selected to raise awareness of how the measurement of child behavioral health care quality at the national level, and corresponding standards for reliability and clinical validity, substantially differ from those traditionally applied to the measurement of child psychopathology. Under a federal mandate, an initial Core Set of quality measures for children was created for voluntary reporting by State Medicaid agencies. The four national child behavioral health quality measures in the 2019 Child Core Set encompass timeliness of care, vary by child age range, and two different types of psychotropic medication treatments. Measures are described and implications for data interpretation are provided. Findings are summarized from: 1) a systematic literature review; 2) State adherence rates; and 3) ten-year national trends in adherence rates by health plan type. Scientific evidence supporting the clinical validity of the measures is scarce, statewide adherence rates widely vary, and improvement over time has been modest. Nevertheless, State Medicaid agencies will be mandated to report measure adherence rates beginning in 2024. Together, these findings stimulate recommendations for health policies to allocate additional resources for data infrastructure to monitor child mental health care quality and identify areas for future research.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild WelfareFamilyHumansMedicaidMental DisordersMental Health ServicesQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesYoung AdultAdherence ratesChildClinical validityMental healthQuality measures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.