Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32291507›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021

[Even low-acuity patients prefer hospital-based emergency care : A survey of non-urgent patients in an emergency department with unique regional position].

A K Reinhold, F Greiner, W Schirrmeister, F Walcher, B Erdmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health care utilization of patients with acute abdominal pain before and after emergency department visits.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Apart from the Medical Complaints, Why do Patients Use Emergency Medical Services? Results of a Patient Survey.Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A K ReinholdMedizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
F GreinerMedizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
W SchirrmeisterMedizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
F WalcherMedizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
B ErdmannZentrale Notfallaufnahme, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Sauerbruchstraße 7, 38440, Wolfsburg, Deutschland. bernadett.erdmann@klinikum.wolfsburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBesides increasing numbers of cases in German emergency departments (ED), the spectrum of attending patients is also changing. Patients with acute illnesses tend to prefer EDs to ambulatory care as primary contact point. This study examines the motives for use and use behavior of low-urgent ED-patients.

methodsAnonymous patient survey in the ED of Wolfsburg Hospital between 12/2015 and 03/2016 with descriptive analysis. All patients with low urgency (Manchester-Triage-System (MTS), levels blue and green) were eligible.

results81.5% of respondents (729 evaluable out of 7000 questionnaires distributed) attended the ED between 8:00 a. m. and 5:00 p. m., 70.1 % of them were walk-in patients. The motive most frequently cited was that they would receive better care in the ED (48.3 %). Contrary to acuity assessment, 67.8 % of respondents considered themselves a medium to life-threatening emergency. As alternative option, 49.2 % would choose a nearby clinic in the region for their complaints.

conclusionSelf-assessed urgency differs with acuity assessment according to MTS. Patients who fear an acute threat to their health do not use services provided in the ambulatory sector such as the emergency practice of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in the immediate proximity sufficiently. Previous approaches for patient navigation do not seem to be successful in this setting. Strengthening of EDs as a single 24/7 access point for emergency care with simultaneous abolition of parallel care structures should be discussed.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesTriageEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency departmentHealth care researchManchester-Triage-SystemPatient navigationPatient survey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.