ArticleSkeletal radiology2020
The radiological diagnosis of extra-articular posteromedial talocalcaneal coalition.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The gorilla lip sign: diagnostic utility of anteroposterior radiographs for pediatric talocalcaneal coalition.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- MRI for paediatric flatfoot: is it necessary?The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Multimodality imaging of the paediatric flatfoot.Skeletal radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesExtra-articular posteromedial talocalcaneal coalition (EA-PM TCC) accounts for approximately one-third of TCC, but its radiographic features are not well-described. The current study aims to compare the radiographic features of EA-PM TCC with normal ankles and with the commoner forms of TCC. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review of cases of TCC over 12 years for whom radiographs, CT, and/or MRI study were available. Radiographs were assessed by 2 radiologists for the presence of the C-sign, talar beak, dysmorphic sustentaculum, absent middle facet, and prominence of the posterior subtalar joint. TCC was classified by a third radiologist based on CT/MRI findings into 3 groups: no TCC, EA-PM TCC, and other TCCs. The radiographic findings for the 3 groups were compared.
resultsThe study included 50 patients, 28 males and 22 females with a mean age of 21.1 years (range 8-70 years). In 15 patients, both ankles had been imaged, resulting in a total of 65 cases. In 17 ankles, no TCC was identified, while 15 ankles were classified as EA-PM TCC and 33 as having other types of TCC. There were no statistically significant differentiating radiological features between the groups with no TCC and EA-PM TCC apart from prominence of the posterior subtalar joint, while only the C-sign allowed identification of patients with other types of TCC.
conclusionsThe study suggests that EA-PM TCC cannot be diagnosed based on the classical indirect radiological signs of TCC, but can be identified by prominence of the posterior subtalar joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32291474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.