ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2020
Identifying 5 Common Psychiatric Disorders Associated Chemicals Through Integrative Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Study and Chemical-Gene Interaction Datasets.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identifying Novel Drug Targets for Epilepsy Through a Brain Transcriptome-Wide Association Study and Protein-Wide Association Study with Chemical-Gene-Interaction Analysis.Molecular neurobiology · 2023Article
- Associations of parental mental disorders and age with childhood mental disorders: a population-based cohort study with four million offspring.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2023Article
- Identifying celiac disease-related chemicals by transcriptome-wide association study and chemical-gene interaction analyses.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- CTD Anatomy: analyzing chemical-induced phenotypes and exposures from an anatomical perspective, with implications for environmental health studies.Current research in toxicology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychiatric disorders are a group of complex psychological syndromes whose etiology remains unknown. Previous study suggested that various chemicals contributed to the development of psychiatric diseases through affecting gene expression. This study aims to systematically explore the potential relationships between 5 major psychiatric disorders and more than 11 000 chemicals. The genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets of attention deficiency/hyperactive disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), bipolar disorder (BD), major depression disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia (SCZ) were driven from the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium and iPSYCH website. The chemicals related gene sets were obtained from the comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD). First, transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) were performed by FUSION to calculate the expression association testing statistics utilizing GWAS summary statistics of the 5 common psychiatric disorders. Chemical-related gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was then conducted to explore the relationships between chemicals and each of the psychiatric diseases. We observed several significant correlations between chemicals and each of the psychiatric disorders. We also detected common chemicals between every 4 of the 5 major psychiatric disorders, such as androgen antagonists for ADHD (P value = .0098), ASD (P value = .0330), BD (P value = .0238), and SCZ (P value = .0062), and imipramine for ADHD (P value = .0054), ASD (P value = .0386), MDD (P value = .0438), and SCZ (P value = .0008). Our study results provide new clues for revealing the roles of environmental chemicals in the development of psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.