Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290872›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2020

Examining the effect of smoking on suicidal ideation and attempts: triangulation of epidemiological approaches.

Ruth Harrison, Marcus R Munafò, George Davey Smith, Robyn E Wootton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruth HarrisonAvon & Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust; and Severn Postgraduate Medical Education School of Psychiatry, Health Education England, UK.
Marcus R MunafòSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol; and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol; and Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK.
Robyn E WoottonSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol; and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3961-3202

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious literature has demonstrated a strong association between cigarette smoking, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. This association has not previously been examined in a causal inference framework and could have important implications for suicide prevention strategies.

aimsWe aimed to examine the evidence for an association between smoking behaviours (initiation, smoking status, heaviness, lifetime smoking) and suicidal thoughts or attempts by triangulating across observational and Mendelian randomisation analyses.

methodFirst, in the UK Biobank, we calculated observed associations between smoking behaviours and suicidal thoughts or attempts. Second, we used Mendelian randomisation to explore the relationship between smoking and suicide attempts and ideation, using genetic variants as instruments to reduce bias from residual confounding and reverse causation.

resultsOur observational analysis showed a relationship between smoking behaviour, suicidal ideation and attempts, particularly between smoking initiation and suicide attempts (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI 1.91-2.26; P < 0.001). The Mendelian randomisation analysis and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis, however, did not support this (odds ratio for lifetime smoking on suicidal ideation, 0.050; 95% CI -0.027 to 0.127; odds ratio on suicide attempts, 0.053; 95% CI, -0.003 to 0.110). Despite past literature showing a positive dose-response relationship, our results showed no clear evidence for a causal effect of smoking on suicidal ideation or attempts.

conclusionsThis was the first Mendelian randomisation study to explore the effect of smoking on suicidal ideation and attempts. Our results suggest that, despite observed associations, there is no clear evidence for a causal effect.

Indexed as

SmokingSuicidal IdeationHumansOdds RatioRisk FactorsSuicide, AttemptedepidemiologyMendelian randomisationsmokingSuicidetobacco

Identifiers

PMID32290872
PMCPMC7705667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.