Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290817›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2020

Correction to: Estimation of treatment preference effects in clinical trials when some participants are indifferent to treatment choice.

Stephen D Walter, Robin M Turner, Petra Macaskill, Kirsten J McCaffery, Les Irwig

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen D WalterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, CRL 233, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. walter@mcmaster.ca.
Robin M TurnerSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Petra MacaskillScreening and Test Evaluation Program, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Kirsten J McCafferyScreening and Test Evaluation Program, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Les IrwigScreening and Test Evaluation Program, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the original publication of this article [1], the number "- 0.49" in the below sentence in the Results section should be changed to "-3.23", and this typo does not affect the wider conclusions.

Identifiers

PMID32290817
PMCPMC7155340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.