Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290578›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Ameliorative Effects of Antibiotic-, Probiotic- and Phytobiotic-Supplemented Diets on the Performance, Intestinal Health, Carcass Traits, and Meat Quality of

Elsayed O S Hussein, Shamseldein H Ahmed, Alaeldein M Abudabos, Gamaleldin M Suliman, Mohamed E Abd El-Hack, Ayman A Swelum, Abdullah N Alowaimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Supplementation effects of feed additive containing eggshell,Journal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Investigating the modulatory effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elsayed O S HusseinDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-3026
Shamseldein H AhmedDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum 12942, Sudan.
Alaeldein M AbudabosDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Gamaleldin M SulimanDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9865-1589
Mohamed E Abd El-HackPoultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2831-8534
Ayman A SwelumDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3247-5898
Abdullah N AlowaimerDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry industry needs efficient antibiotic alternatives to prevent necrotic enteritis (NE) infections. Here, we evaluate the effects of probiotic and/or prebiotic dietary supplementation on performance, meat quality and carcass traits, using only an NE coinfection model, in broiler chickens. Three hundred and twenty-four healthy Ross 308 broiler chicks are allocated into six groups. Taking a 35 d feeding trial, the chicks are fed a basal diet with 0.0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.12, 0.5 + 0.12, and 0.2 g Kg

Indexed as

broilerClostridium perfringensphytobioticprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID32290578
PMCPMC7222811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.