Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290532›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Differences in the Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks between Rod Photoreceptors of Rodents, Pigs, and Humans.

Florian Frohns, Antonia Frohns, Johanna Kramer, Katharina Meurer, Carla Rohrer-Bley, Irina Solovei, David Hicks, Paul G Layer, Markus Löbrich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Florian FrohnsRadiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Antonia FrohnsPlant Membrane Biophysics, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Johanna KramerDevelopmental Biology and Neurogenetics, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Katharina MeurerRadiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Carla Rohrer-BleyDivision of Radiation Oncology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-2722
Irina SoloveiBiozentrum, Biology-II, University of Munich (LMU), 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6813-7279
David HicksDépartement de Neurobiologie des Rythmes, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, Université de Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France.
Paul G LayerDevelopmental Biology and Neurogenetics, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Markus LöbrichRadiation Biology and DNA Repair, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Technische Universität Darmstadt · DEInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives · FRUniversity of Zurich · CHUrologische Klinik München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing (GE) represents a powerful approach to fight inherited blinding diseases in which the underlying mutations cause the degeneration of the light sensing photoreceptor cells of the retina. Successful GE requires the efficient repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) generated during the treatment. Rod photoreceptors of adult mice have a highly specialized chromatin organization, do not efficiently express a variety of DSB response genes and repair DSBs very inefficiently. The DSB repair efficiency in rods of other species including humans is unknown. Here, we used ionizing radiation to analyze the DSB response in rods of various nocturnal and diurnal species, including genetically modified mice, pigs, and humans. We show that the inefficient repair of DSBs in adult mouse rods does not result from their specialized chromatin organization. Instead, the DSB repair efficiency in rods correlates with the level of Kruppel-associated protein-1 (KAP1) expression and its ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent phosphorylation. Strikingly, we detected robust KAP1 expression and phosphorylation only in human rods but not in rods of other diurnal species including pigs. Hence, our study provides important information about the uniqueness of the DSB response in human rods which needs to be considered when choosing model systems for the development of GE strategies.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAnimalsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDNA RepairGene EditingHumansMiceRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsSwineATMchromatinCRISPR-Cas9DNA double-stranded breakDNA repairgenome editinginherited retinal dystrophiesKAP1photoreceptorsretina

Identifiers

PMID32290532
PMCPMC7226979
OpenAlexW3015723371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.