ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of mechanical and chemical decontamination methods for the treatment of dental implant surfaces affected by peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Pooled it
- Adjunctive Electrolytic Implant Surface Decontamination in the Reconstructive Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis-A Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Trial
- A randomised clinical trial comparing a surgical approach for treatment of peri-implantitis to non-surgical debridement with adjunctive diode laser therapy.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of different implant surface decontamination techniques on bacterial load and surface integrity: an in-vitro study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Laboratory Investigation of the Effect of Three Decontamination Methods on Surface Alterations of Dental Implants :.Galen medical journal · 2025Article
- Implant Surface Decontamination Methods That Can Impact Implant Wettability.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of Electrocautery and Laser Treatment on the Composition and Morphology of Surface-Modified Titanium Implants.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of Clinical Decontamination Techniques on the Surface Characteristics of SLA Titanium Implant.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Decontamination of multispecies oral biofilm from rough implant surface by airflow with glycine.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Article
- The effects of physical decontamination methods on zirconia implant surfaces: a systematic review.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2021Review
- Oral Prevention and Management of Oral Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Influence of Surgical Experience and Bone Density on the Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in Edentulous Jaws Using a Mucosa-Supported Surgical Template with a Half-Guided Implant Placement Protocol-A Randomized Clinical Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies.Dentistry journal · 2020Article
- Accuracy Evaluation of 14 Maxillary Full Arch Implant Treatments Performed with Da Vinci Bridge: A Case Series.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Decontamination efficiency of sodium-bicarbonate and glycine air-polishing agents on sand-blasted acid-etched titanium surface and its toxicity against human gingival fibroblasts.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration. This study aims to evaluate the effects of four different mechanical and physical treatments on titanium samples with moderately rough surface. Air powder abrasion (AP) with glycine powder, a titanium brush (TB) and a diode laser at 3 W (L3) and 4 W (L4) were tested. Surface morphology, roughness and chemical composition were then assessed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), white light interferometer and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. The microscopic analysis revealed significant alterations in surface morphology on TB samples, while AP and L3 had only a minor or null impact. L4 samples revealed signs of overheating due to the excessive power. Nevertheless, the overall roughness of the samples was not significantly altered in terms of roughness parameters. Similarly, surface chemical composition was not significantly affected by the treatments. Among the treatments tested in this study, air powder abrasion with glycine powder and 3 W diode laser had the lowest impact on surface physicochemical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.