Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290386›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Hypoxia, Inflammation and Necrosis as Determinants of Glioblastoma Cancer Stem Cells Progression.

Marco Papale, Mariachiara Buccarelli, Cristiana Mollinari, Matteo A Russo, Roberto Pallini, Lucia Ricci-Vitiani, Marco Tafani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. HMGB1: A Central Node in Cancer Therapy Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. iScience · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco PapaleDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Mariachiara BuccarelliDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1157-4694
Cristiana MollinariInstitute of Translational Pharmacology, National Research Council, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8112-5427
Matteo A RussoIRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5847-6015
Roberto PalliniFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Lucia Ricci-VitianiDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Marco TafaniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-810X
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute RF-2011-02349126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor hypoxic microenvironment causes hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) activation and necrosis with alarmins release. Importantly, HIF-1α also controls the expression of alarmin receptors in tumor cells that can bind to and be activated by alarmins. Human tumor tissues possess 1-2% of cancer stem cells (CSCs) residing in hypoxic niches and responsible for the metastatic potential of tumors. Our hypothesis is that hypoxic CSCs express alarmin receptors that can bind alarmins released during necrosis, an event favoring CSCs migration. To investigate this aspect, glioblastoma stem-like cell (GSC) lines were kept under hypoxia to determine the expression of hypoxic markers as well as receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). The presence of necrotic extracts increased migration, invasion and cellular adhesion. Importantly, HIF-1α inhibition by digoxin or acriflavine prevented the response of GSCs to hypoxia alone or plus necrotic extracts. In vivo, GSCs injected in one brain hemisphere of NOD/SCID mice were induced to migrate to the other one in which a necrotic extract was previously injected. In conclusion, our results show that hypoxia is important not only for GSCs maintenance but also for guiding their response to external necrosis. Inhibition of hypoxic pathway may therefore represent a target for preventing brain invasion by glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs).

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBiomarkersCell Line, TumorCell MovementDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansHypoxiaHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitMiceNecrosisNeoplastic Stem CellsBiomarkersHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitReactive Oxygen Speciesalarminscancer stem cellsglioblastomahypoxiamolecular rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32290386
PMCPMC7215563
OpenAlexW3015821423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.