ArticleBrain sciences2020
Time Window of Perturbation-Induced Response Triggered by Ankle Motion and Body Sway above the Ankle.
Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We determined the precise time windows of the electromyographic (EMG) response components triggered by ankle motion and by body sway above the ankle. A support surface under the feet of healthy young adult participants in the quiet stance was moved in translation. The EMG response component triggered by body displacement above the ankle began at 95-100 ms and ended 145-155 ms after the onset of the support surface translation. The EMG response triggered by ankle dorsiflexion began at 35-50 ms and ended 110-115 ms after the onset of the translation in the soleus muscle, indicating that the response component began at a time similar to the short-latency response. In contrast, the response component in the gastrocnemius muscle began noticeably after that. The EMG response triggered by ankle dorsiflexion began at 75-85 ms and ended 125-135 ms after the onset of the translation in the gastrocnemius muscle. Our findings indicate that the threshold of the early response component to the somatic sensation of the ankle motion in the soleus muscle is lower than that in the gastrocnemius muscle. The response component triggered by the ankle motion continued long after the end of ankle dorsiflexion, indicating that the early component is mediated not only by the monosynaptic stretch reflex pathway but also by the polysynaptic pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.