Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290364›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Evaluation of a Newly Developed Vacuum Dried Microtiter Plate for Rapid Biocide Susceptibility Testing of Clinical

Alice Roedel, Ralf Dieckmann, Oliwia Makarewicz, Anita Hartung, Matthias Noll, Mathias W Pletz, Sascha Al Dahouk, Szilvia Vincze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alice RoedelGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Ralf DieckmannGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Oliwia MakarewiczInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Anita HartungInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Matthias NollInstitute for Bioanalysis, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 96450 Coburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-5968
Mathias W PletzInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Sascha Al DahoukGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3835-0818
Szilvia VinczeGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Department of Biological Safety, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEJena University Hospital · DECoburg University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung BfR grant 1322-674Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KI1504Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0096D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the suitability of a newly developed biocide susceptibility test system based on microtiter plates containing vacuum dried biocides as a fast and reliable screening method. The evaluated substances included the cationic biocides benzalkonium chloride (BAC), chlorhexidine dihydrochloride (CHX), cetylpyridinium chloride, didecyldimethylammonium chloride, and octenidine dihydrochloride. Testing a selection of

Indexed as

biocide susceptibilityEnterococcus faeciumvancomycin-resistantVRE

Identifiers

PMID32290364
PMCPMC7232460
OpenAlexW3015847501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.