Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290288›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Report on Smoking Detection and Quitting Technologies.

Alessandro Ortis, Pasquale Caponnetto, Riccardo Polosa, Salvatore Urso, Sebastiano Battiato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The mutagenic effect of tobacco smoke on male fertility.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  12. Smoking Cessation System for Preemptive Smoking Detection.IEEE internet of things journal · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessandro OrtisDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria, 6, 95125 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-4679
Pasquale CaponnettoCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 89, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Riccardo PolosaCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 89, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8450-5721
Salvatore UrsoCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 89, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Sebastiano BattiatoDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria, 6, 95125 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6127-2470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile health technologies are being developed for personal lifestyle and medical healthcare support, of which a growing number are designed to assist smokers to quit. The potential impact of these technologies in the fight against smoking addiction and on improving quitting rates must be systematically evaluated. The aim of this report is to identify and appraise the most promising smoking detection and quitting technologies (e.g., smartphone apps, wearable devices) supporting smoking reduction or quitting programs. We searched PubMed and Scopus databases (2008-2019) for studies on mobile health technologies developed to assist smokers to quit using a combination of Medical Subject Headings topics and free text terms. A Google search was also performed to retrieve the most relevant smartphone apps for quitting smoking, considering the average user's rating and the ranking computed by the search engine algorithms. All included studies were evaluated using consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research, such as applied methodologies and the performed evaluation protocol. Main outcome measures were usability and effectiveness of smoking detection and quitting technologies supporting smoking reduction or quitting programs. Our search identified 32 smoking detection and quitting technologies (12 smoking detection systems and 20 smoking quitting smartphone apps). Most of the existing apps for quitting smoking require the users to register every smoking event. Moreover, only a restricted group of them have been scientifically evaluated. The works supported by documented experimental evaluation show very high detection scores, however the experimental protocols usually lack in variability (e.g., only right-hand patients, not natural sequence of gestures) and have been conducted with limited numbers of patients as well as under constrained settings quite far from real-life use scenarios. Several recent scientific works show very promising results but, at the same time, present obstacles for the application on real-life daily scenarios.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationSmoking ReductionTobacco SmokingHumansSmokersSmokinghealth technologiesmedical mobile appssmoking cessationsmoking detectiontechnology reviewwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID32290288
PMCPMC7177980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.