Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290256›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Dietary Diversity and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Japanese Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Rei Otsuka, Chikako Tange, Yukiko Nishita, Yuki Kato, Makiko Tomida, Tomoko Imai, Fujiko Ando, Hiroshi Shimokata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rei OtsukaSection of NILS-LSA, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6184-570X
Chikako TangeSection of NILS-LSA, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.
Yukiko NishitaDepartment of Epidemiology of Aging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.
Yuki KatoSection of NILS-LSA, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.
Makiko TomidaSection of NILS-LSA, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.
Tomoko ImaiSection of NILS-LSA, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.
Fujiko AndoSection of NILS-LSA, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-6388
Hiroshi ShimokataSection of NILS-LSA, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi 474-8511, Japan.

Funding

National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan 28-40,19-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined associations between dietary diversity and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in 386 men and 413 women (age range, 60-79 years at baseline) who took part in the National Institute for Longevity Sciences-Longitudinal Study of Aging study from 1997 to 2000. Dietary intake was assessed using three-day dietary records and photographs. The Quantitative Index for Dietary Diversity was used to determine the dietary diversity among thirteen food groups. Dietary diversity score and each food intake were examined by sex-stratified tertiles, and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated to compare the risk for all-cause and cause-specific deaths across tertiles, after controlling for age, sex, body mass index, alcohol intake, smoking status, education, physical activity, and disease history. During a mean follow-up of 15.7 years, 289 subjects (36.2%) died. Compared to the subjects in the lowest tertile, the multivariate-adjusted HR for all-cause and cancer mortality was 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.94) and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.33-0.98), respectively (trend

Indexed as

Cause of DeathDietDiet RecordsEatingIndependent LivingAgedAge FactorsAsian PeopleBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanLongitudinal Studiesall-cause mortalitycancer mortalitydietary diversityJapaneseolder people

Identifiers

PMID32290256
PMCPMC7230563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.