Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290210›Full record

ReviewGenes2020

Comprehensive History of

Guoxia Liu, Ning Xuan, Balaji Rajashekar, Philippe Arnaud, Bernard Offmann, Jean-François Picimbon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lactobacillus for ribosome peptide editing cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  11. Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Proteins inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Guoxia LiuBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China.
Ning XuanBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China.
Balaji RajashekarInstitute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu 50090, Estonia.
Philippe ArnaudProtein Engineering and Functionality Unit, University of Nantes, 44322 Nantes, France.
Bernard OffmannProtein Engineering and Functionality Unit, University of Nantes, 44322 Nantes, France.
Jean-François PicimbonBiotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China.
Nantes Université · FRShandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNQilu University of Technology · CNUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we present the developmental, histological, evolutionary and functional properties of insect chemosensory proteins (CSPs) in insect species. CSPs are small globular proteins folded like a prism and notoriously known for their complex and arguably obscure function(s), particularly in pheromone olfaction. Here, we focus on direct functional consequences on protein function depending on duplication, expression and RNA editing. The result of our analysis is important for understanding the significance of RNA-editing on functionality of

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhylogenyAnimalsInsectaInsect ProteinsReceptors, OdorantSensory Receptor CellsInsect ProteinsReceptors, Odorantadaptive processlipid transportneuroplasticityRNA mutationtandem duplicationxenobiotic resistance

Identifiers

PMID32290210
PMCPMC7230875
OpenAlexW3015477262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.