Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32290105›Full record

ReviewCells2020

Mouse Models of Inherited Retinal Degeneration with Photoreceptor Cell Loss.

Gayle B Collin, Navdeep Gogna, Bo Chang, Nattaya Damkham, Jai Pinkney, Lillian F Hyde, Lisa Stone, Jürgen K Naggert, Patsy M Nishina, Mark P Krebs

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gayle B CollinThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Navdeep GognaThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Bo ChangThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Nattaya DamkhamThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Jai PinkneyThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Lillian F HydeThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Lisa StoneThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3998-9579
Jürgen K NaggertThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Patsy M NishinaThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Mark P KrebsThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, ME 04609, USA.
Jackson Laboratory · USSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

TREAT AD Structural Biology CoreU54AG065187 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Gregory W Carter, ALLAN I LEVEY · 2019 to 2026
$69.7M
RETINAL DISEASE: MOLECULAR BASIS AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGYR01EY011996 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Patsy M Nishina · 1998 to 2026
$12.4M
Eye Mutant ResourceR01EY019943 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHANG, BO · 2010 to 2022
$6.1M
Genetic Modifiers of Retinal DiseaseR01EY027305 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Patsy M Nishina · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Identifying Shared Pathogenic Networks and Molecular Targets Underlying Retinal Pigmented Epithelial Associated DiseaseR01EY027860 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CARTER, GREGORY W, NISHINA, PATSY M · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
Genetic Modifiers of Enhanced S-cone Syndrome –Role of the External Limiting MembraneR01EY028561 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI NAGGERT, JUERGEN K. · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Identification and Pathology of a Macula-Related Structure in the Mouse EyeR21EY027894 · NEI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI KREBS, MARK P · 2018 to 2019
$459k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011996NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019943NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027305NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027860NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028561NEI NIH HHS R21 EY027894NIA NIH HHS U54 AG065187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inherited retinal degeneration (RD) leads to the impairment or loss of vision in millions of individuals worldwide, most frequently due to the loss of photoreceptor (PR) cells. Animal models, particularly the laboratory mouse, have been used to understand the pathogenic mechanisms that underlie PR cell loss and to explore therapies that may prevent, delay, or reverse RD. Here, we reviewed entries in the Mouse Genome Informatics and PubMed databases to compile a comprehensive list of monogenic mouse models in which PR cell loss is demonstrated. The progression of PR cell loss with postnatal age was documented in mutant alleles of genes grouped by biological function. As anticipated, a wide range in the onset and rate of cell loss was observed among the reported models. The analysis underscored relationships between RD genes and ciliary function, transcription-coupled DNA damage repair, and cellular chloride homeostasis. Comparing the mouse gene list to human RD genes identified in the RetNet database revealed that mouse models are available for 40% of the known human diseases, suggesting opportunities for future research. This work may provide insight into the molecular players and pathways through which PR degenerative disease occurs and may be useful for planning translational studies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsHumansMicePhotoreceptor CellsRetinal DegenerationRetinitis PigmentosaciliopathiesLeber congenital amaurosismouse genetic modelsretinitis pigmentosavisual photoreceptor cell loss

Identifiers

PMID32290105
PMCPMC7227028
OpenAlexW3015551372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.