ArticlePediatric research2021
A hospital-based cohort study of gender and gestational age-specific body fat percentage at birth.
Article in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does being male represent a risk factor for DDH treatment? A systematic review.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical and ultrasound assessment of body composition in preterm infants at discharge: an observational study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBirthweight is the most commonly used proxy marker but does not adequately define true nutritional status. Modalities like DXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) and TOtal Body Electric Conductivity (TOBEC) have been validated to assess body composition but their accuracy in neonates has not been established. The PEAPOD (COSMED, Rome Italy) has been validated as an accurate tool for measuring percentage body fat (%BF) in newborns. The study aim was to determine the gender-specific %BF percentiles at different gestations (35-41 weeks) for a healthy population of newborn infants. A secondary aim was to determine whether there is any relationship between %BF and neonatal condition at birth (cord gas measurement).
methods%BF was measured using air displacement plethysmography (PEAPOD) within 6 h of birth.
resultsThere is an increase in the mean %BF with increasing gestation for female and males from 36 weeks' gestation in the 7667 infants who underwent assessment. Females have a higher %BF than their male equivalents. There was no correlation between %BF and cord pH.
conclusionGender and gestation are both important in determining the quantiles and mean %BF at birth. There was no correlation between low cord pH and %BF. IMPACT: Measuring the percentage body fat (PEAPOD) at birth is a useful marker of an infant's nutritional status. This is the largest hospital-based cohort of gestational age and gender-specific %BF in healthy newborns. The normative graphs from this study will help to accurately determine high-risk infants with low %BF so they can be monitored appropriately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.