Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32289801›Full record

ArticleJournal of innate immunity2020

Modulation of Airway Epithelial Innate Immunity and Wound Repair by M(GM-CSF) and M(M-CSF) Macrophages.

Sander van Riet, Annemarie van Schadewijk, Steve de Vos, Nick Vandeghinste, Robbert J Rottier, Jan Stolk, Pieter S Hiemstra, Padmini Khedoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of innate immunity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Methods and Models for StudyingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. On the path to predicting immune responses in the lung: Modeling the pulmonary innate immune system at the air-liquid interface (ALI).European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modelers Modelling Models.Journal of innate immunity · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A Leak in the Dike.Journal of innate immunity · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sander van RietDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, s.van_riet@lumc.nl.
Annemarie van SchadewijkDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Steve de VosGalapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
Nick VandeghinsteGalapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
Robbert J RottierDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan StolkDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pieter S HiemstraDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Padmini KhedoeDepartment of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airway epithelial cells and macrophages participate in inflammatory responses to external noxious stimuli, which can cause epithelial injury. Upon injury, epithelial cells and macrophages act in concert to ensure rapid restoration of epithelial integrity. The nature of the interactions between these cell types during epithelial repair is incompletely understood. We used an in vitro human coculture model of primary bronchial epithelial cells cultured at the air-liquid interface (ALI-PBEC) and polarized primary monocyte-derived macrophages. Using this coculture, we studied the contribution of macrophages to epithelial innate immunity, wound healing capacity, and epithelial exposure to whole cigarette smoke (WCS). Coculture of ALI-PBEC with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated M(GM-CSF) macrophages increased the expression of DEFB4A, CXCL8, and IL6 at 24 h in the ALI-PBEC, whereas LPS-activated M(M-CSF) macrophages only increased epithelial IL6 expression. Furthermore, wound repair was accelerated by coculture with both activated M(GM-CSF) and M(M-CSF) macrophages, also following WCS exposure. Coculture of ALI-PBEC and M(GM-CSF) macrophages resulted in increased CAMP expression in M(GM-CSF) macrophages, which was absent in M(M-CSF) macrophages. CAMP encodes LL-37, an antimicrobial peptide with immune-modulating and repair-enhancing activities. In conclusion, dynamic crosstalk between ALI-PBEC and macrophages enhances epithelial innate immunity and wound repair, even upon concomitant cigarette smoke exposure.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateWound HealingCell CommunicationCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesEpithelial CellsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMacrophagesRespiratory MucosaGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorAirway epithelial cellsCocultureLL-37MacrophagesWound repair

Identifiers

PMID32289801
PMCPMC7506214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.