Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32289703›Full record

ReviewBrain stimulation

Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Devin Adair, Dennis Truong, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Nigel Gebodh, Helen Borges, Libby Ho, J Douglas Bremner, Bashar W Badran, Vitaly Napadow, Vincent P Clark and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Research on the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation regulation of different targets on working memory based on electroencephalography].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  18. Improved olfactory function following high-frequency transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation in post-COVID-19 patients with olfactory dysfunction.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Devin AdairDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Dennis TruongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Zeinab EsmaeilpourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: znb.esmailpoor@gmail.com.
Nigel GebodhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Helen BorgesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Libby HoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
J Douglas BremnerDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA.
Bashar W BadranDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Vitaly NapadowMartinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, MGH, Harvard medical school, Boston, MA, USA.
Vincent P ClarkPsychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Dept. Psychology, MSC03-2220, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA; The Mind Research Network of the Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, 1101 Yale Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.
Marom BiksonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: bikson@ccny.cuny.edu.
City College of New York · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USEmory University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Training and Career Development CoreU54CA132378 · NCI · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI Bao Q Vuong · 2008 to 2026
$28.9M
Training and Career Development and Education CoreU54CA137788 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ADRIANA ESPINOSA, FRANCESCA M GANY · 2008 to 2026
$28.1M
Techniques DevelopmentP2CHD086844 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GEORGE, MARK S · 2015 to 2024
$12.7M
Core NIBSP01AT009965 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LOGGIA, MARCO LUCIANO · 2018 to 2023
$10.9M
Pilot Project Program (PPP)P30GM122734 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI MAYER, ANDREW ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$7.0M
G-RISE: Graduate Research Initiative for Student Advancement at The City College of New YorkT32GM136499 · NIGMS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI RUTH E. STARK · 2020 to 2026
$4.9M
Mapping the linkage between auricular vagus nerve receptors and cardiovagal modulationOT2OD023867 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NAPADOW, VITALY · 2016 to 2021
$3.4M
Dopamine function, inflammation and connectivity in PTSDR01MH120262 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BREMNER, JAMES DOUGLAS · 2020 to 2023
$2.9M
A tool-box to control and enhance tDCS spatial precisionR01MH111896 · NIMH · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI BIKSON, MAROM · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
The coupled vascular hypothesis for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)R01NS101362 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI BIKSON, MAROM · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Biological Correlates of Traumatic StressK24MH076955 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BREMNER, JAMES DOUGLAS · 2006 to 2013
$946k
Non-Invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Opioid Use Disorders UG3DA048502 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BREMNER, JAMES DOUGLAS, INAN, OMER TOLGA · 2020 to 2021
$844k
NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT009965NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132378NCI NIH HHS U54 CA137788NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR016917NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD086844NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA048502NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM122734NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136499NIH HHS OT2 OD023867NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH076955NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111896NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120262NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH103468NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH067547NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS101362NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS054783RRD VA I01 RX003418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cranial nerves are the pathways through which environmental information (sensation) is directly communicated to the brain, leading to perception, and giving rise to higher cognition. Because cranial nerves determine and modulate brain function, invasive and non-invasive cranial nerve electrical stimulation methods have applications in the clinical, behavioral, and cognitive domains. Among other neuromodulation approaches such as peripheral, transcranial and deep brain stimulation, cranial nerve stimulation is unique in allowing axon pathway-specific engagement of brain circuits, including thalamo-cortical networks. In this review we amalgamate relevant knowledge of 1) cranial nerve anatomy and biophysics; 2) evidence of the modulatory effects of cranial nerves on cognition; 3) clinical and behavioral outcomes of cranial nerve stimulation; and 4) biomarkers of nerve target engagement including physiology, electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and behavioral metrics. Existing non-invasive stimulation methods cannot feasibly activate the axons of only individual cranial nerves. Even with invasive stimulation methods, selective targeting of one nerve fiber type requires nuance since each nerve is composed of functionally distinct axon-types that differentially branch and can anastomose onto other nerves. None-the-less, precisely controlling stimulation parameters can aid in affecting distinct sets of axons, thus supporting specific actions on cognition and behavior. To this end, a rubric for reproducible dose-response stimulation parameters is defined here. Given that afferent cranial nerve axons project directly to the brain, targeting structures (e.g. thalamus, cortex) that are critical nodes in higher order brain networks, potent effects on cognition are plausible. We propose an intervention design framework based on driving cranial nerve pathways in targeted brain circuits, which are in turn linked to specific higher cognitive processes. State-of-the-art current flow models that are used to explain and design cranial-nerve-activating stimulation technology require multi-scale detail that includes: gross anatomy; skull foramina and superficial tissue layers; and precise nerve morphology. Detailed simulations also predict that some non-invasive electrical or magnetic stimulation approaches that do not intend to modulate cranial nerves per se, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), may also modulate activity of specific cranial nerves. Much prior cranial nerve stimulation work was conceptually limited to the production of sensory perception, with individual titration of intensity based on the level of perception and tolerability. However, disregarding sensory emulation allows consideration of temporal stimulation patterns (axon recruitment) that modulate the tone of cortical networks independent of sensory cortices, without necessarily titrating perception. For example, leveraging the role of the thalamus as a gatekeeper for information to the cerebral cortex, preventing or enhancing the passage of specific information depending on the behavioral state. We show that properly parameterized computational models at multiple scales are needed to rationally optimize neuromodulation that target sets of cranial nerves, determining which and how specific brain circuitries are modulated, which can in turn influence cognition in a designed manner.

Indexed as

BrainCentral Nervous System DiseasesCognitionCranial NervesElectric Stimulation TherapyElectroencephalographyHumansNeuroimagingTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCranial nerveOlfactoryOpticStimulationTrigeminalVagusVestibulocochlear

Identifiers

PMID32289703
PMCPMC7196013
OpenAlexW3008199196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.