Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32289380›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2020

Clinical outcomes in men of diverse ethnic backgrounds with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

S Halabi, S Dutta, C M Tangen, M Rosenthal, D P Petrylak, I M Thompson, K N Chi, J S De Bono, J C Araujo, C Logothetis and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Race and Outcomes to [Cancers · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Disparities With Systemic Therapies for Black Men Having Advanced Prostate Cancer: Where Do We Stand?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 17 institutions in 5 countries.

S HalabiDuke University Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, USA. Electronic address: susan.halabi@duke.edu.
S DuttaOld Dominion University, Norfolk, USA.
C M TangenFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA.
M RosenthalThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
D P PetrylakYale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
I M ThompsonChristus San Rosa Hospital Medical Center, San Antonio, USA.
K N ChiBritish Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
J S De BonoThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.
J C AraujoThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
C LogothetisThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
M A EisenbergerThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
D I QuinnUniversity of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA.
K FizaziGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
M J MorrisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
C S HiganoUniversity of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA.
I F TannockPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
E J SmallUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
W K KellySidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBC Cancer Agency · CAChristus Santa Rosa Health System · USDuke Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOld Dominion University · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CARoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Washington · USYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have shown previously in multivariable analysis that black men had 19% lower risk of death than white men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with a docetaxel and prednisone (DP)-based regimen. The primary goal of this analysis was to compare progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical PFS, ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from baseline and objective response rate (ORR) in white, black and Asian men with mCRPC treated with a DP-based regimen. PATIENTS AND

methodsIndividual patient data from 8820 mCRPC men randomized on nine phase III trials to a DP-containing regimen were combined. Race used in the analysis was based on self-report. End points were PFS, biochemical PSA, ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline and ORR. The proportional hazards and the logistic regression models were employed to assess the prognostic importance of race in predicting outcomes adjusting for established prognostic factors.

resultsOf 8820 patients, 7528 (85%) were white, 500 (6%) were black, 424 were Asian (5%) and 368 (4%) had race unspecified. Median PFS were 8.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-8.5], 8.2 (95% CI 7.4-8.8) and 8.3 (95% CI 7.6-8.8) months in white, black and Asian men, respectively. Median PSA PFS were 9.9 (95% CI 9.7-10.4), 8.5 (95% CI 8.0-10.3) and 11.1 (95% CI 9.9-12.5) months in white, black and Asian men, respectively.

conclusionsWe observed no differences in clinical outcomes by race and ethnic groups in men with mCRPC enrolled on these phase III clinical trials with DP.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelEthnicityHumansMalePrednisoneProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDocetaxelPrednisoneProstate-Specific Antigenbiochemical progressiondisparitydocetaxelobjective response rateprogression-free survivalPSA decline

Identifiers

PMID32289380
PMCPMC7580036
OpenAlexW3015511562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.