Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32289106›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2018

Impact of health challenges on pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and net returns under commercial conditions.

A S Cornelison, L A Karriker, N H Williams, B J Haberl, K J Stalder, L L Schulz, J F Patience

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Safety Evaluation of an Intranasally Applied Cocktail ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A S CornelisonDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
L A KarrikerDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostics and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
N H WilliamsIowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA.
B J HaberlIowa Select Farms, Iowa Falls, IA.
K J StalderDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
L L SchulzDepartment of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
J F PatienceDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Iowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how disease affects commercial production is imperative for pig producers to quantify its full impact on pig performance, carcass quality, and net returns. The objective of this experiment was to assess the productivity and economic importance of naturally occurring health challenges (

Indexed as

economicsporcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)swineswine influenza virus (IAV-S)

Identifiers

PMID32289106
PMCPMC7107292
OpenAlexW2895135518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.