ReviewCurrent opinion in food science2016
Foodborne viruses.
Review in Current opinion in food science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Gastroenteric Viruses in Marketed Bivalve Mollusks in the Tourist Cities of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2022.Viruses · 2024Article
- Common and Potential Emerging Foodborne Viruses: A Comprehensive Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Dynamic and Seasonal Distribution of Enteric Viruses in Surface and Well Water in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Review of Modern Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Assessing the Removal Efficiency of Murine Norovirus 1, Hepatitis A Virus, and Human Coronavirus 229E on Dish Surfaces Through General Wash Program of Household Dishwasher.Food and environmental virology · 2023Article
- Recent Progress in Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for Food Monitoring.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Can food matrices be considered as a potential carrier for COVID-19?Le infezioni in medicina · 2022Review
- Pathogenicity and virulence of hepatitis A virus.Virulence · 2021Review
- Assessment of the Impact on Human Health of the Presence of Norovirus in Bivalve Molluscs: What Data Do We Miss?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Monitoring of new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): Origin, transmission, and food preservation methods.Journal of food processing and preservation · 2021Review
- In the landscape of SARS-CoV-2 and fresh fruits and vegetables: The fake and hidden transmission risks.Journal of food safety · 2021Review
- Food products as potential carriers of SARS-CoV-2.Food control · 2021Review
- The Safety of Slaughterhouse Workers during the Pandemic Crisis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Microbial Dose-Response Curves and Disinfection Efficacy Models Revisited.Food engineering reviews · 2021Review
- Foodborne Viruses and Innovative Non-Thermal Food-Processing Technologies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Viral indicators for tracking domestic wastewater contamination in the aquatic environment.Water research · 2020Review
- Effects of Weather and Environmental Factors on the Seasonal Prevalence of Foodborne Viruses in Irrigation Waters in Gyeonggi Province, Korea.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Food hazards on the European Union market: The data analysis of the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed.Food science & nutrition · 2020Article
- Missing the Match Might Not Cost You the Game: Primer-Template Mismatches Studied in Different Hepatitis A Virus Variants.Food and environmental virology · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Two Triplex One-Step qRT-PCR Assays for the Quantification of Human Enteric Viruses in Environmental Samples.Food and environmental virology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the wide variety of viral agents liable to be found as food contaminants, noroviruses and hepatitis A virus are responsible for most well characterized foodborne virus outbreaks. Additionally, hepatitis E virus has emerged as a potential zoonotic threat. Molecular methods, including an ISO standard, are available for norovirus and hepatitis A virus detection in foodstuffs, although the significance of genome copy detection with regard to the associated health risk is yet to be determined through viability assays. More precise and rapid methods for early foodborne outbreak investigation are being developed and they will need to be validated versus the ISO standard. In addition, protocols for next-generation sequencing characterization of outbreak-related samples must be developed, harmonized and validated as well.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.