ArticleRevue francophone des laboratoires : RFL
[Interests and limitations of rapid diagnostic tests for respiratory and gastrointestinal viral diseases].
Article in Revue francophone des laboratoires : RFL. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), based on immunochromatography, are widely used for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. For viral respiratory infections, RDT target infections by influenza viruses or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). For diagnosis of gastroenteritis, RDT can be used for the detection of rotavirus, adenovirus, norovirus or astrovirus. RDT for RSV or gastroenteritis are mainly used in a pediatric context. RDT generally present a high specificity, however their sensitivity is only modest by comparison with molecular technics. Consequently, RDT are essentially considered as screening tests, and their negativity does not allow to exclude the diagnostic of respiratory or gastrointestinal viral infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.