Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32288636›Full record

ReviewNotfall & rettungsmedizin2017

[Noninvasive ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory failure].

H Fuchs, D Klotz, T Nicolai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Notfall & rettungsmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H Fuchs1Neonatologie und päd. Intensivmedizin, Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg - Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, Mathildenstraße 1, 79106 Freiburg, Deutschland.
D Klotz1Neonatologie und päd. Intensivmedizin, Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg - Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, Mathildenstraße 1, 79106 Freiburg, Deutschland.
T Nicolai2von Haunersches Kinderspital München, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Deutschland.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be used to treat pediatric acute respiratory failure. Recent improvements in ventilator technology and availability of nasal and full face masks for infants and children have simplified the use of NIV even in the smallest children. Mainly patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure may benefit from noninvasive ventilation. There is some evidence available that supports the use of NIV in viral bronchiolitis, asthma and acute on chronic respiratory failure in patients with neuromuscular or chronic pulmonary disease. Furthermore, noninvasive ventilation is beneficial during prolonged weaning from invasive ventilation and to treat upper airway obstructions. Children suffering from hypoxic respiratory failure, such as community-acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome do not benefit from NIV. Due to possibly relevant side effects and the possibility of rapid deterioration in gas exchange in failure of NIV, invasive ventilation should be readily available; therefore, treatment with noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure in children should be initiated on the pediatric intensive care ward.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeHigh flow nasal cannulaSide effectsVentilation, mechanicalWeaning

Identifiers

PMID32288636
PMCPMC7101806
OpenAlexW2763057137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.