ArticleAntibiotiques (Paris, France : 1999)2010
[CCR5 antagonists and HIV-1 infection: Bases and consequences of this therapeutic approach].
Article in Antibiotiques (Paris, France : 1999), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CCR5 molecule is a chemokine receptor with an important role in infectious diseases; not only is it the main coreceptor for HIV-1, but it has also been involved in the immune defense against various transmissible agents. CCR5 antagonists constitute a new class of antiretrovirals. Three molecules of this class have reached phases 2B and 3 of clinical development: aplaviroc (GlaxoSmithKine), vicriviroc (Schering-Plough) and maraviroc (Pfizer). The development of aplaviroc was stopped because of some cases of drug-induced hepatitis. In ACTG 5211 and Motivate trials, adding vicriviroc (in phase 3 trials) or maraviroc (now approved for clinical use) respectively to an optimized background regimen in treatment-experienced patients has resulted in a significant virologic benefit. The place of this new therapeutic class in strategies of initial, switch or rescue treatment needs further investigation, and its interest in immunological non-responders, in severe immunosuppressed patients or in subjects harbouring non-R5 HIV-1 strains, remains to be addressed. Major concerns about their use still remain, including long-term tolerability, the risk of inducing an R5 to X4 switch, particularly in compartments other than blood, and the risk of interfering with some immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.